Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31044000›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2019

Integrating field-based heat tents and cyber-physical system technology to phenotype high night-time temperature impact on winter wheat.

Nathan T Hein, Dan Wagner, Raju Bheemanahalli, David Šebela, Carlos Bustamante, Anuj Chiluwal, Mitchell L Neilsen, S V Krishna Jagadish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Elevated COFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan T Hein1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.
Dan Wagner2Department of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
Raju Bheemanahalli1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.
David Šebela1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.
Carlos Bustamante1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.
Anuj Chiluwal1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.
Mitchell L Neilsen2Department of Computer Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA.
S V Krishna Jagadish1Department of Agronomy, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center, Kansas State University, 1712 Claflin Road, Manhattan, KS 66506-5501 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1501-0960

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany agronomic traits have been bred into modern wheat varieties, but wheat (

resultsThrough implementation of a side roll up and a top ventilation system, heaters, and a custom cyber-physical system using a Raspberry Pi, the heat tents were able to consistently maintain an elevated temperature through the night to differentiate heat stress impact on different genotypes. When the tents were placed in their day-time setting they were able to maintain ambient day-time temperature without having to be removed and replaced on the plots. Data averaged from multiple sensors over three consecutive weeks resulted in a consistent but small temperature difference of 0.25 °C within the tents, indicating even distribution of heat. While targeting a temperature differential of 4 °C, the tents were able to maintain an average differential of 3.2 °C consistently throughout the night-time heat stress period, compared to the outside ambient conditions. The impact of HNT stress was confirmed through a statistically significant yield reduction in eleven of the twelve genotypes tested. The average yield under HNT stress was reduced by 20.3% compared to the controls, with the highest reduction being 41.4% and a lowest reduction of 6.9%. Recommendations for fine-tuning the system are provided.

conclusionThis methodology is easily accessible and can be widely utilized due to its flexibility and ease of construction. This system can be modified and improved based on some of the recommendations and has the potential to be used across other crops or plants as it is not reliant on access to any hardwired utilities. The method tested will help the crop community to quantify the impact of HNT stress, identify novel donors that induce tolerance to HNT and help the breeders develop crop varieties that are resilient to changing climate.

Indexed as

Cyber-physical systemHeat stressHeat tentsHigh night-time temperatureRaspberry PiWheat

Identifiers

PMID31044000
PMCPMC6480702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.