Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043818›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Area-level income disparities in colorectal screening in Canada: evidence to inform future surveillance.

A Blair, L Gauvin, S Ouédraogo, G D Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An ounce of "superscreener": A novel cancer screening program targeting unattached individuals.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Racial and sociodemographic distribution of colorectal cancer screening in Canada: A cross-sectional study.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why are we organizing another costing supplement inCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A BlairDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.
L GauvinDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.
S OuédraogoDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.
G D DattaDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal Montreal, QC.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Participation in colorectal screening remains low even in countries with universal health coverage. Area-level determinants of low screening participation in Canada remain poorly understood. Methods: We assessed the association between area-level income and two indicators of colorectal screening (having never been screened, having not been screened recently) by linking census-derived local area-level income data with self-reported screening data from urban-dwelling respondents to the Canadian Community Health Survey (50-75 years of age, cycles 2005 and 2007, Results: About 53% of the study population had never been screened. Among individuals who had ever been screened, 35% had been screened recently. Adjusting for covariates, lower area-level income was associated with having never been screened [covariate-adjusted prevalence ratios: 1.24 for quartile 1; 95% confidence limits (cl): 1.16, 1.34; 1.25 for quartile 2; 95% cl: 1.15, 1.33; 1.15 for quartile 3; 95% cl: 1.08, 1.23]. Among individuals who had been screened in their lifetime, area-level income was not associated with having not been screened recently. Conclusions: Lower area-level income is associated with having never been screened for colorectal cancer even after adjusting for individual socioeconomic factors. Those findings highlight the potential importance of socioeconomic contexts for colorectal screening initiation and merit attention in both future research and surveillance efforts.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAgedCanadaColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancer preventionepidemiologyinequalitiesneighborhoodspublic healthscreening

Identifiers

PMID31043818
PMCPMC6476461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.