Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043805›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

Moving toward the elimination of cervical cancer: modelling the health and economic benefits of increasing uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines.

A Smith, N Baines, S Memon, N Fitzgerald, J Chadder, C Politis, E Nicholson, C Earle, H Bryant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Exploring the role of the oncology nurse in cervical cancer screening programs during times of transition.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Estimating the future cancer management costs attributable to modifiable risk factors in Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Shooting for the Moon: Can We Cut Cancer Mortality in Canada By 50% By 2050?Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SmithCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
N BainesCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
S MemonCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
N FitzgeraldCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
J ChadderCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
C PolitisCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
E NicholsonCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
C EarleCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
H BryantCanadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, ON.
Canadian Partnership Against Cancer · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The human papillomavirus (hpv) is a common sexually transmitted infection and a primary cause of cervical cancer. The Government of Canada has set a target of reaching 90% hpv vaccine coverage among adolescents by 2025. Here, we examine hpv vaccine uptake in school-based immunization programs across Canada and explore how achieving the 90% target could affect the future incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, and health system expenditures in a cohort of Canadian women. Methods: Data for hpv vaccine uptake in the most recent reported school year available in each jurisdiction were provided in 2017 by jurisdictional school-based immunization programs and were used to estimate a national weighted average of 67%. The OncoSim microsimulation model (version 2.5) was used to compare 3 different levels of hpv vaccine uptake (0%, 67%, 90%) on health and economic outcomes for a hypothetical cohort of all 5- to 10-year-old girls in Canada in 2015. Results: Vaccine uptake for girls in school-based programs varied from 55.0% to 92.0% in the jurisdictions reviewed. The OncoSim model projects that increasing uptake to 90% from 67% would result in a 23% reduction in cervical cancer incidence rates (to 3.1 cases from 4.0 cases per 100,000, averaged across the lifetime of the cohort) and a 23% decline in the average annual mortality rate (to 1.0 deaths from 1.3 deaths per 100,000). Finally, the model projects that the health system will incur a cost of $9 million (1% increase) during the lifetime of the cohort if uptake is increased to 90% from 67%. Costs are discounted (1.5%) and expressed in 2016 Canadian dollars. Costs reflect the payer perspective. Conclusions: Our model shows that increasing hpv vaccine uptake to 90% from current levels for girls in school-based immunization programs could result in substantial reductions in the future incidence and mortality rates for cervical cancer in Canada.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAgedCanadaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMass VaccinationMiddle AgedPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPapillomavirus Vaccinescancer controlcancer modellingcancer outcome projectionscervical cancerhpv vaccinationOncoSim

Identifiers

PMID31043805
PMCPMC6476443
OpenAlexW2942868120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.