Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043804›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2019

A network approach to developing immuno-oncology combinations in Canada.

V Higenell, R Fajzel, G Batist, P K Cheema, H L McArthur, B Melosky, D Morris, T M Petrella, R Sangha, M F Savard and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Third-line treatment patterns in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of real-world data in Canada.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

V HigenellExactis Innovation, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
R FajzelExactis Innovation, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
G BatistExactis Innovation, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC.
P K CheemaWilliam Osler Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
H L McArthurDivision of Hematology Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.
B MeloskyMedical Oncology, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC.
D MorrisDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB.
T M PetrellaOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.
R SanghaDepartment of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB.
M F SavardDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB.
S S SridharMedical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON.
J StaggFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC.
D J StewartDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON.
S VermaDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized care for many cancer indications, with considerable effort now being focused on increasing the rate, depth, and duration of patient response. One strategy is to combine immune strategies (for example, ctla-4 and PD-1/L1-directed agents) to harness additive or synergistic efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Despite encouraging results with such combinations in multiple tumour types, numerous clinical challenges remain, including a lack of biomarkers that reliably predict outcome, the emergence of therapeutic resistance, and optimal management of immune-related toxicities. Furthermore, the selection of ideal combinations from the myriad of immune, systemic, and locoregional therapies has yet to be determined. A longitudinal network-based approach could offer advantages in addressing those critical questions, including long-term follow-up of patients beyond individual trials. The molecular cancer registry Personalize My Treatment, managed by the Networks of Centres of Excellence nonprofit organization Exactis Innovation, is uniquely positioned to accelerate Canadian immuno-oncology (io) research efforts throughout its national network of cancer sites. To gain deeper insight into how a pan-Canadian network could advance research in io combinations, Exactis invited preeminent clinical and scientific advisors from across Canada to a roundtable event in November 2017. The present white paper captures the expert advice provided: leverage longitudinal patient data collection; facilitate network collaboration and assay harmonization; synergize with existing initiatives, networks, and biobanks; and develop an io combination trial based on Canadian discoveries.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationInformation ServicesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCanadaHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalbiobankingcancer networksImmuno-oncologymolecular cancer registriesmolecular profilingprecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID31043804
PMCPMC6476440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.