ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2020
Undiagnosed prediabetes status is associated with a reduced effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with erectile dysfunction.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sperm DNA Fragmentation: A New Guideline for Clinicians.The world journal of men's health · 2020Review
- Undiagnosed prediabetes status is associated with a reduced effectiveness of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors in men with erectile dysfunction.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and undiagnosed prediabetes (PreDM) has been scantly analysed. We aimed to assess rates of and predictors of response to oral treatment in a cohort of ED men naïve for PDE5i with either normo-glycaemia or PreDM or diabetes mellitus (DM). Complete data from 466 men were analysed. Comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at baseline and after 3 months of PDE5i treatment. Treatment response was evaluated using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (mild: +2; moderate: +5; severe: +7 from baseline IIEF-EF). PreDM status was defined as for the American Diabetes Association (2015) criteria. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models tested the association between clinical predictors and MCID response. Overall, 253 (56.7%), 105 (23.5%) and 88 (19.7%) patients had normo-glycaemia (=controls), PreDM and DM, respectively. Diabetic and PreDM men were older, had higher BMI, higher CCI scores and lower total testosterone (tT) (all p < 0.01) compared to controls. Median baseline IIEF-EF was lower both in PreDM (14.0 vs. 18.0; p < 0.05) and DM patients (10.0 vs. 18.0; p < 0.001) than in controls. IIEF-EF improved in all groups after treatment (all p < 0.001), but scores were higher in controls compared to both PreDM and DM men at 3-mos assessment (26.0 vs. 20.0 vs. 17.5, respectively; all p < 0.001). Controls more frequently achieved significant MCID than both PreDM and DM patients (65.3 vs. 22.9 vs. 11.8%, respectively; p < 0.01). Age (p < 0.001), baseline IIEF-EF (p < 0.001), and DM status (p = 0.02) were independently associated with MCID. In conclusion, patients with undiagnosed PreDM depicted lower rates of response to PDE5i than normoglycemic men. These findings suggest that even milder forms of glucose impairment are associated with a poorer PDE5i effectiveness in men with ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.