Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Honey bees increase their foraging performance and frequency of pollen trips through experience.

Simon Klein, Cristian Pasquaretta, Xu Jiang He, Clint Perry, Eirik Søvik, Jean-Marc Devaud, Andrew B Barron, Mathieu Lihoreau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Insects · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A review of short-term weather impacts on honey production.International journal of biometeorology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The potential underlying mechanisms during learning flights.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inferring pesticide toxicity to honey bees from a field-based feeding study using a colony model and Bayesian inference.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Characterization of pollen profile ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Simon KleinResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI); CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Cristian PasquarettaResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI); CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Xu Jiang HeHoneybee Research Institute, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330045, P.R. China.
Clint PerryDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Eirik SøvikVolda University College, Department of Science and Mathematics, Volda, 6100, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9347-0831
Jean-Marc DevaudResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI); CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9873-2204
Andrew B BarronDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia. andrew.barron@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-6628
Mathieu LihoreauResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI); CNRS, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRJiangxi Agricultural University · CNMacquarie University · AUQueen Mary University of London · GBVolda University College · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bee foragers must supply their colony with a balance of pollen and nectar to sustain optimal colony development. Inter-individual behavioural variability among foragers is observed in terms of activity levels and nectar vs. pollen collection, however the causes of such variation are still open questions. Here we explored the relationship between foraging activity and foraging performance in honey bees (Apis mellifera) by using an automated behaviour monitoring system to record mass on departing the hive, trip duration, presence of pollen on the hind legs and mass upon return to the hive, during the lifelong foraging career of individual bees. In our colonies, only a subset of foragers collected pollen, and no bee exclusively foraged for pollen. A minority of very active bees (19% of the foragers) performed 50% of the colony's total foraging trips, contributing to both pollen and nectar collection. Foraging performance (amount and rate of food collection) depended on bees' individual experience (amount of foraging trips completed). We argue that this reveals an important vulnerability for these social bees since environmental stressors that alter the activity and reduce the lifespan of foragers may prevent bees ever achieving maximal performance, thereby seriously compromising the effectiveness of the colony foraging force.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationPlant NectarAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorFlight, AnimalLongevityPollenPlant Nectar

Identifiers

PMID31043647
PMCPMC6494865
OpenAlexW2943329730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.