Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043548›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of rheumatology2020

Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials.

Katie Bechman, Mark Yates, Sam Norton, Andrew P Cope, James B Galloway

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. UpadacitinibDrugs in context · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie BechmanFrom the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. katie.bechman@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-0463
Mark YatesFrom the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-5211
Sam NortonFrom the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1714-9963
Andrew P CopeFrom the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-5496
James B GallowayFrom the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1230-2781
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001516Medical Research Council MR/R001332/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUnderstanding the placebo response is critical to interpreting treatment efficacy, particularly for agents with a ceiling to their therapeutic effect, where an increasing placebo response makes it harder to detect potential benefit. The objective of this study is to assess the change in placebo responses over time in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCT) for drug licensing authorization.

methodsThe Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database was searched to identify RCT of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in RA. Studies were excluded if patients were conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD)-naive, not receiving background csDMARD therapy, or were biologic experienced. Metaregression model was used to evaluate changes in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 treatment response over time.

resultsThere were 32 trials in total: anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (n = 15), tocilizumab (n = 4), abatacept (n = 2), rituximab (n = 2), and Janus kinase inhibitors (n = 9). From 1999 to 2018, there was no significant trend in the age or sex of patients in the placebo arm. Disease duration, swollen joint count, and 28-joint count Disease Activity Score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline all significantly declined over time. There was a statistically significant increase in placebo ACR50 and ACR70 responses (ACR50 β = 0.41, 95% CI 0.09-0.74, p = 0.01; ACR70 β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, p = 0.01) that remained significant after controlling for potential confounders.

conclusionThere has been a rise in the placebo response in RA clinical trials over the last 2 decades. Shifting RA phenotype, changes in trial design, and expectation bias are possible explanations for this phenomenon. This observation has important implications when evaluating newer novel agents against established therapies.

Indexed as

Placebo EffectRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsFemaleHumansJanus Kinase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Outcome AssessmentTreatment OutcomeTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsJanus Kinase InhibitorsTNF protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY RESPONSEOUTCOME MEASURESPLACEBORHEUMATOID ARTHRITISSTUDY DESIGNSYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Identifiers

PMID31043548
PMCPMC6941937
OpenAlexW2943164804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.