Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043468›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2019

Don't Get Wound Up: Revised Fluoroquinolone Breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Tam T Van, Emi Minejima, Chiao An Chiu, Susan M Butler-Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluating outcomes associated with revised fluoroquinolone breakpoints for Enterobacterales urinary tract infections: A retrospective cohort study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Molecular Epidemiology ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. QSAR Models for Active Substances againstMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tam T VanDepartment of Pathology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Emi MinejimaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, USC School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Chiao An ChiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, USC School of Pharmacy, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Susan M Butler-WuDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California, USA butlerwu@usc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluoroquinolones remain some of the more commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents in the United States, despite the wide array of reported side effects that are associated with their use. In 2019, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised the fluoroquinolone antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints for both

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Laboratory ServicesEnterobacteriaceaeFluoroquinolonesGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPractice Guidelines as TopicPseudomonas aeruginosaUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolonesbreakpointciprofloxacinCLSIfluoroquinolonelevofloxacin

Identifiers

PMID31043468
PMCPMC6595448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.