Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31043162›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Altered postural timing and abnormally low use of proprioception in lumbar spinal stenosis pre- and post- surgical decompression.

Sarah Kneis, Verena Bruetsch, Daniela Dalin, Ulrich Hubbe, Christoph Maurer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06075862 (Postural Imbalance Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06075862 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Postural Imbalance Amongst Elderly Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Before and After Decompressive Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorRegion ZealandRan2023 to 2028Enrolled80ConditionsLumbar Spinal StenosisArmsDecompressive surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Balancing ability of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KneisDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Verena BruetschDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniela DalinDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrich HubbeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Christoph MaurerDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. christoph.maurer@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

DFG ADV139FP7 610454H2020-SC1-2017-CNECT-1 769574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is frequently associated with postural instability. Although several studies evaluated patients' functional impairments, underlying sensorimotor mechanisms are still poorly understood. We aimed to assess the specific set of postural control deficits associated with LSS during spontaneous and externally perturbed stance and evaluated post-surgical changes in postural behavior.

methodsWe analyzed postural control in eleven LSS patients (age 69 ± 8 years) pre- and post-laminectomy, correlated experimental data with functional tests and patient-reported outcomes, and compared findings to 15 matched, healthy control subjects (age 70 ± 6 years). Postural control was characterized by spontaneous sway measures and measures of perturbed stance. Perturbations were induced by anterior-posterior pseudorandom tilts of the body support surface. We used an established postural control model to extract specific postural control parameters.

resultsSpontaneous sway amplitude, velocity and frequency were abnormally large in LSS patients. Furthermore, patients' postural reactions to platform tilts, represented by GAIN and PHASE were significantly altered. Based on simple feedback model simulations, we found that patients rely less on proprioceptive cues for stance regulation than healthy subjects. Moreover, their postural reactions' timing is altered. After surgery, patients' spontaneous sway amplitude was significantly reduced and their postural timing approximated the behavior of healthy subjects.

conclusionThe reduction in proprioceptive input for stance control due to stenosis-caused afferent dysfunction is a functional disadvantage for LSS patients - and may be the basis of increased spontaneous sway. This disadvantage may cause the timing of postural reactions to alter, with the intent of preventing rapid changes in stance regulation for safety reasons. After surgery, patients' postural timing approximated those of healthy subjects, while the abnormally low use of proprioception remained unchanged. We suggest the post-surgery rehabilitation of proprioception, eg through balance exercises on unstable surfaces and reduced visual input.

Indexed as

LaminectomyAgedCase-Control StudiesExercise TherapyFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPostural BalancePosturePreoperative PeriodReaction TimeSpinal StenosisCenter of pressureLow back painPostural balancePosturographyQuality of lifeWalking speed

Identifiers

PMID31043162
PMCPMC6495568
OpenAlexW2947956630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.