ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2019
Thermo-mechanical analysis of a probe for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy operating at cryogenic temperatures.
Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this article, we present the thermo-mechanical analysis of an electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) probe operating at cryogenic temperatures using finite element analysis. Thermo-mechanical analysis plays a key role in the mechanical design evaluation process as EPR probes are often subjected to large stresses under such extreme conditions. For simplification, we assume thermal conduction to be the dominant mode of heat transfer over convection and radiation. The simulation model consists of a cryostat-probe assembly with appropriate thermal and structural boundary conditions. The predicted temperature distributions from the steady-state thermal analysis is then used for the stress analysis of the EPR probe. The stress analysis indicated that stresses in the EPR probe are below the ultimate strengths of each component, and thus safe for running EPR experiments. Furthermore, the simulation results were confirmed experimentally, and we found that the predicted heat losses for the EPR probe assembly and the sample holder are in excellent agreement with the experimental measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.