Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042733›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

An ethnography of chronic pain management in primary care: The social organization of physicians' work in the midst of the opioid crisis.

Fiona Webster, Kathleen Rice, Joel Katz, Onil Bhattacharyya, Craig Dale, Ross Upshur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of strong opioids and antibiotics prescribing with GP burnout: a retrospective cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Suffering: Indigenous Peoples' Experiences of Accessing Mental Health and Substance Use Services.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fiona WebsterArthur and Sonia Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7318-7713
Kathleen RiceDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joel KatzDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Onil BhattacharyyaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Craig DaleLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5042-0332
Ross UpshurDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 136625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study reports on physicians' experiences with chronic pain management. For over a decade prescription opioids have been a primary treatment for chronic pain in North America. However, the current opioid epidemic has complicated long-standing practices for chronic pain management which historically involved prescribing pain medication. Caring for patients with chronic pain occurs within a context in which a growing proportion of patients suffer from chronic rather than acute conditions alongside rising social inequities.

methodsOur team undertook an ethnographic approach known as institutional ethnography in the province of Ontario, Canada in order to explore the social organization of chronic pain management from the standpoint of primary care physicians. This paper reports on a subset of this study data, specifically interviews with 19 primary care clinicians and 8 nurses supplemented by 40 hours of observations. The clinicians in our sample were largely primary care physicians and nurses working in urban, rural and Northern settings.

findingsIn their reflections on providing care for patients with chronic pain, many providers describe being most challenged by the work involved in helping patients who also struggled with poverty, mental health and addiction. These frustrations were often complicated by concerns that they could lose their license for inappropriate prescribing, thus shifting their work from providing treatment and care to policing their patients for malingering and opioid abuse.

interpretationOur findings show that care providers find the treatment of patients with chronic pain-especially those patients also experiencing poverty-to be challenging at best, and at worst frustrating and overwhelming. In many instances, their narratives suggested experiences of depersonalization, loss of job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion in relation to providing care for these patients, key dimensions of burnout. In essence, the work that they performed in relation to their patients' social rather than medical needs seems to contribute to these experiences. Their experiences were further exacerbated by the fact that restricting and reducing opioid dosing in patients with chronic pain has become a major focus of care provision.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalChronic PainFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleNursesOccupational StressOntarioOpioid-Related DisordersPain ManagementPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Nurses'Practice Patterns, Physicians'Socioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID31042733
PMCPMC6493733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.