Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042706›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Experimentally guided computational antibody affinity maturation with de novo docking, modelling and rational design.

Daniel A Cannon, Lu Shan, Qun Du, Lena Shirinian, Keith W Rickert, Kim L Rosenthal, Martin Korade, Lilian E van Vlerken-Ysla, Andrew Buchanan, Tristan J Vaughan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Antibody Affinity Maturation by Computational Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. From immune evasion to broadFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Design of nanobody-based bispecific constructs byComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel A CannonDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Lu ShanDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2334-9216
Qun DuDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Lena ShirinianDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Keith W RickertDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Kim L RosenthalDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Martin KoradeDepartment of Oncology Research, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Lilian E van Vlerken-YslaDepartment of Oncology Research, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Andrew BuchananDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tristan J VaughanDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Melissa M DamschroderDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States of America.
Bojana PopovicDepartment of Antibody Discovery and Protein Engineering, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0756-5149
AstraZeneca (United States) · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies are an important class of therapeutics that have significant clinical impact for the treatment of severe diseases. Computational tools to support antibody drug discovery have been developing at an increasing rate over the last decade and typically rely upon a predetermined co-crystal structure of the antibody bound to the antigen for structural predictions. Here, we show an example of successful in silico affinity maturation of a hybridoma derived antibody, AB1, using just a homology model of the antibody fragment variable region and a protein-protein docking model of the AB1 antibody bound to the antigen, murine CCL20 (muCCL20). In silico affinity maturation, together with alanine scanning, has allowed us to fine-tune the protein-protein docking model to subsequently enable the identification of two single-point mutations that increase the affinity of AB1 for muCCL20. To our knowledge, this is one of the first examples of the use of homology modelling and protein docking for affinity maturation and represents an approach that can be widely deployed.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsAntibodiesAntibody AffinityChemokine CCL20Computational BiologyComputer SimulationDrug DesignImmunoglobulin Variable RegionMiceModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationAntibodiesCCL20 protein, mouseChemokine CCL20Immunoglobulin Variable Region

Identifiers

PMID31042706
PMCPMC6513101
OpenAlexW2942512732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.