Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042696›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Effects of MDMA on attention to positive social cues and pleasantness of affective touch.

Anya K Bershad, Leah M Mayo, Kathryne Van Hedger, Francis McGlone, Susannah C Walker, Harriet de Wit

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Endocannabinoid contributions to the perception of socially relevant, affective touch in humans.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. MDMA enhances positive affective responses to social feedback.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. C-low threshold mechanoreceptors: a novel target for health-tech in an increasingly touch-deprived world.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Psychedelic therapeutics in psychiatric conditions.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  14. Causal Inference in Studies with Functional Unmasking: Psychedelics and Beyond.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anya K BershadDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Leah M MayoCenter for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-4869
Kathryne Van HedgerDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, UK.
Francis McGloneSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Susannah C WalkerSchool of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. hdew@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USLinköping University · SELiverpool John Moores University · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAININGT32GM007281 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CLARK, MARCUS RAMSAY · 1985 to 2022
$32.1M
Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychostimulant drug ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) reportedly produces distinctive feelings of empathy and closeness with others. MDMA increases social behavior in animal models and has shown promise in psychiatric disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). How it produces these prosocial effects is not known. This behavioral and psychophysiological study examined the effects of MDMA, compared with the prototypical stimulant methamphetamine (MA), on two measures of social behavior in healthy young adults: (i) responses to socially relevant, "affective" touch, and (ii) visual attention to emotional faces. Men and women (N = 36) attended four sessions in which they received MDMA (0.75 or 1.5 mg/kg), MA (20 mg), or a placebo in randomized order under double-blind conditions. Responses to experienced and observed affective touch (i.e., being touched or watching others being touched) were assessed using facial electromyography (EMG), a proxy of affective state. Responses to emotional faces were assessed using electrooculography (EOG) in a measure of attentional bias. Subjective ratings were also included. We hypothesized that MDMA, but not MA, would enhance the ratings of pleasantness and psychophysiological responses to affective touch and increase attentional bias toward positive facial expressions. Consistent with this, we found that MDMA, but not MA, selectively enhanced ratings of pleasantness of experienced affective touch. Neither drug altered the ratings of pleasantness of observed touch. On the EOG measure of attentional bias, MDMA, but not MA, increased attention toward happy faces. These results provide new evidence that MDMA can enhance the experience of positive social interactions; in this case, pleasantness of physical touch and attentional bias toward positive facial expressions. The findings are consistent with evidence that the prosocial effects are unique to MDMA relative to another stimulant. Understanding the behavioral and neurobiological processes underlying the distinctive social effects of MDMA is a key step to developing the drug for psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAffectAttentionAttentional BiasCuesDouble-Blind MethodElectromyographyElectrooculographyFacial MusclesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMethamphetamineAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsMethamphetamineN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID31042696
PMCPMC6785008
OpenAlexW2943600109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.