Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042692›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry investigation2019

Comparison of the Usefulness of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 for Screening for Major Depressive Disorder: Analysis of Psychiatric Outpatient Data.

Cheolmin Shin, Seung-Hoon Lee, Kyu-Man Han, Ho-Kyoung Yoon, Changsu Han

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05461092 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Regional Nerve Blocks to Improve Analgesia and Recovery in Older Adults Undergoing Spinal Fusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsDelirium, Pain, Back, Spinal Fusion, Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane BlockArmsThoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) Block of bupivacaine, Blood Test, 3D CAM Delirium Severity Scoring, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale, Numerical Rating Score (NRS)
NCT06878937 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

'Thriving With Bipolar Disorder': Co-design and Pilot Evaluation of a Peer-Delivered, Quality of Life Focused Group Psychoeducation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2025 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsBipolar Disorder (BD), Quality of Life (QOL)ArmsPeer Delivered Psychoeducation Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Preliminary effects of a yoga intervention for lung cancer dyads: benefits for care partners.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. An examination of chronotype associations with symptoms of depression, PTSD, and sleep disturbances in US military veterans.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Depressive symptoms and perceived stress in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy: A longitudinal study.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cheolmin ShinDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Hoon LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyu-Man HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Kyoung YoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Changsu HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HC15C1405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to demonstrate that the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-8 is not less useful than the PHQ-9 as a screening test for major depressive disorder (MDD).

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 567 patients in psychiatric outpatient units. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used to diagnose MDD. We derived the validity and reliability of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9. To evaluate the ability of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 to discriminate MDD, we drew receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and compared the areas under the curves (AUCs).

resultsOf the 567 participants, 207 (36.5%) were diagnosed with MDD. Cronbach's αs for the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9 were 0.892 and 0.876, respectively. Similar to the PHQ-9, the PHQ-8 was also associated with scores on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in a correlation analysis. When we drew ROC curves for the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9, there was no statistically significant difference in the AUCs. With a cutoff score of 10, the PHQ-8 showed a sensitivity of 58.3%, specificity of 83.1%, positive predictive value of 53.4%, and negative predictive value of 85.7%.

conclusionIn a psychiatric outpatient sample, the PHQ-8 was as useful as the PHQ-9 for MDD screening.

Indexed as

DepressionMajor depressive disorderPHQ-8PHQ-9

Identifiers

PMID31042692
PMCPMC6504773
OpenAlexW2942118272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.