Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042285›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2019

Fast and accurate relatedness estimation from high-throughput sequencing data in the presence of inbreeding.

Kristian Hanghøj, Ida Moltke, Philip Alstrup Andersen, Andrea Manica, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristian HanghøjCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Ida MoltkeDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philip Alstrup AndersenDepartment of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes Vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andrea ManicaDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Thorfinn Sand KorneliussenCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe estimation of relatedness between pairs of possibly inbred individuals from high-throughput sequencing (HTS) data has previously not been possible for samples where we cannot obtain reliable genotype calls, as in the case of low-coverage data.

resultsWe introduce ngsRelateV2, a major revision of ngsRelateV1, a program that originally allowed for estimation of relatedness from HTS data among non-inbred individuals only. The new revised version takes into account the possibility of individuals being inbred by estimating the 9 condensed Jacquard coefficients along with various other relatedness statistics. The program is threaded and scales linearly with the number of cores allocated to the process.

conclusionThe program is available as an open source C/C++ program under the GPL license and hosted at https://github.com/ANGSD/ngsRelate. To facilitate easy analysis, the program is able to work directly on the most commonly used container formats for raw sequence (BAM/CRAM) and summary data (VCF/BCF).

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInbreedingGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASoftwaregenotype likelihoodhigh-throughput sequencing datainbreedingJacquard coefficientsnext-generation sequencingpopulation geneticsrelatedness estimationthreading

Identifiers

PMID31042285
PMCPMC6488770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.