Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31042268›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2019

Association Between Physiological Stenosis Severity and Angina-Limited Exercise Time in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Christopher M Cook, Yousif Ahmad, James P Howard, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Amarjit Sethi, Gerald J Clesham, Kare H Tang, Sukhjinder S Nijjer, Paul A Kelly, John R Davies and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of an interactive CTCA/FFRThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher M CookImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yousif AhmadImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James P HowardImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew J Shun-ShinImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Amarjit SethiImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Gerald J CleshamEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Kare H TangEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Sukhjinder S NijjerImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul A KellyEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
John R DaviesEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Iqbal S MalikImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Raffi KaprielianImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ghada MikhailImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo PetracoImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Takayuki WarisawaImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Firas Al-JanabiEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Grigoris V KaramasisEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Shah MohdnazriEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Reto GammaEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Guus A de WaardImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rasha Al-LameeImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas R KeebleEssex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Jamil MayetImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sayan SenImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Darrel P FrancisImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Justin E DaviesImperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBEssex Cardiothoracic Centre · GBAnglia Ruskin University · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS 04/079British Heart Foundation FS/05/006British Heart Foundation FS/10/38/28268British Heart Foundation FS/11/46/28861British Heart Foundation FS/14/13/30619British Heart Foundation FS/14/27/30752Department of HealthMedical Research Council G1000357Medical Research Council G1100443Medical Research Council MR/M018369/1Wellcome Trust 212183/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Physiological stenosis assessment is recommended to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable angina. Objective: To determine the association between all commonly used indices of physiological stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time in patients with stable angina. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included data (without follow-up) collected over 1 year from 2 cardiac hospitals. Selected patients with stable angina and physiologically severe single-vessel coronary artery disease presenting for clinically driven elective PCI were included. Exposures: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and coronary flow reserve (CFR) were measured invasively. Immediately after this, patients maximally exercised on a catheter-table-mounted supine ergometer until they developed rate-limiting angina. Subsequent PCI was performed in most patients, followed by repeat maximal supine exercise testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Associations between FFR, iFR, HSR, CFR, and angina-limited exercise time were assessed using linear regression and Pearson correlation coefficients. Additionally, the associations between the post-PCI increment in exercise time and baseline FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were assessed. Results: Twenty-three patients (21 [91.3%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [8.1] years) completed the pre-PCI component of the study protocol. Mean (SD) stenosis diameter was 74.6% (10.4%). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) values were 0.54 (0.44-0.72) for FFR, 0.53 (0.38-0.83) for iFR, 1.67 (0.84-3.16) for HSR, and 1.35 (1.11-1.63) for CFR. Mean (SD) angina-limited exercise time was 144 (77) seconds. Anatomical stenosis characteristics were not significantly associated with angina-limited exercise time. Conversely, FFR (R2 = 0.27; P = .01), iFR (R2 = 0.46; P < .001), HSR (R2 = 0.39; P < .01), and CFR (R2 = 0.16; P < .05) were all associated with angina-limited exercise time. Twenty-one patients (19 [90.5%] of whom were male; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [8.2] years) competed the full protocol of PCI, post-PCI physiological assessment, and post-PCI maximal exercise. After PCI, the median (IQR) FFR rose to 0.91 (0.85-0.96), median (IQR) iFR to 0.98 (0.94-0.99), and median (IQR) CFR to 2.73 (2.50-3.12), while the median (IQR) HSR fell to 0.16 (0.06-0.37) (P < .001 for all). The post-PCI increment in exercise time was most significantly associated with baseline iFR (R2 = 0.26; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In a selected group of patients with severe, single-vessel stable angina, FFR, iFR, HSR, and CFR were all modestly correlated with angina-limited exercise time to varying degrees. Notwithstanding the limited sample size, no clear association was demonstrated between anatomical stenosis severity and angina-limited exercise time.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAngina, StableCardiac CatheterizationCoronary StenosisExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID31042268
PMCPMC6495364
OpenAlexW2942827505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.