Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31041618›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2020

Recurrence of Rathke's cleft cysts based on gross total resection of cyst wall: a meta-analysis.

Victor M Lu, Krishnan Ravindran, Avital Perry, Christopher S Graffeo, Hassan Y Dawood, Jamie J Van Gompel, Rania A Mekary, Timothy R Smith

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rathke's cleft cyst: From history to molecular genetics.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victor M LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. lu.victor@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9470-5890
Krishnan RavindranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Avital PerryDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Christopher S GraffeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Hassan Y DawoodComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jamie J Van GompelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Rania A MekaryComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Timothy R SmithComputational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rathke's cleft cysts (RCCs) are benign growths of the embryological Rathke's pouch. Surgical decompression provides effective symptomatic relief in most cases; however, the effect of gross total resection (GTR) of the cyst wall on recurrence, as well as pituitary function, is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to pool the current literature and ascertain the recurrence control afforded by GTR of the cyst wall compared with subtotal resection (STR). Searches of seven electronic databases from inception to January 2019 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines, resulting in 476 articles to be screened. Outcomes were analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions. A total of 10 retrospective cohort studies satisfied selection criteria, describing 655 surgically managed RCC cases, with 254 (39%) and 401 (61%) achieving GTR and STR of the cyst wall, respectively. GTR was associated with significantly reduced overall RCC recurrence by fixed-effects (FE) modeling (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.96), but not by random effects (RE) modeling (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.51-1.12). Based on both models, GTR was associated with significantly reduced symptomatic recurrence (RE model, RR, 0.37, 95% CI, 0.14-0.95) and significantly increased postoperative diabetes insipidus (RE model, RR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.34-5.03). There was insufficient data to evaluate other pituitary axes in this context. The current evidence indicates that GTR of the RCC cyst wall has the potential to affect the incidence of overall and symptomatic RCC recurrences, as well as drive postoperative DI incidence. However, expectations of clinical and pragmatic benefit following cyst wall resection should be titrated carefully against the potential for postoperative and pituitary morbidities which currently remain poorly defined. Greater granularity is required to understand all factors that can influence recurrence and quality of life when evaluating resection of RCC.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System CystsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeurosurgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeGross total resection, extent of resectionRathke’s cleft cystRecurrenceSurgical resection

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.