Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31041591›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2019

A Pilot, Randomized Study in Women of Nutrition-Related Clinical Chemistry at 6 Weeks after Roux en Y Gastric Bypass: Comparison of Two Nutrition Support Plans.

Robert A DiSilvestro, Patricia Choban, Fernando N Aguila, Marcus Miller, Elizabeth Joseph

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert A DiSilvestroMedinutra LLC, 8050 Simfield Rd, Dublin, OH, 43016, USA. studies@columbus.rr.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5927-6288
Patricia ChobanDepartment of Surgery, Central Ohio Surgical Associates, Mt Carmel Health Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Fernando N AguilaDepartment of Surgery, Central Ohio Surgical Associates, Mt Carmel Health Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Marcus MillerDepartment of Surgery, Central Ohio Surgical Associates, Mt Carmel Health Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Elizabeth JosephMedinutra LLC, 8050 Simfield Rd, Dublin, OH, 43016, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current pilot study tested a twofold hypothesis: some nutrition-related chemical measures change by 6 weeks after Roux en Y Gastric Bypass (RNYGB); one of two nutrition support plans will prevent chemical signs of nutrition problems at 6 weeks better than the other. After RNYGB, nutrition support should begin right away. However, studies on nutritional status mostly examine subjects much later. In addition, little attention has been paid to optimizing nutrition support plans.

methodsPremenopausal females scheduled for RNYGB were given either a commercially available meal replacement product (2 servings/day) + other supplements or just a new meal replacement (2 servings/day). The latter included some nutrient versions that might enhance absorption. Blood and urine samples were taken before and 6 weeks after surgery.

resultsIn both groups, plasma vitamin D and B

conclusionsNutrition-related parameters showed varying trends 6 weeks after RNYGB. Some of the trends were affected by the type of nutritional support provided.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassNutritional SupportAdultBlood GlucoseFemaleHumansNutritional StatusPilot ProjectsVitaminsBlood GlucoseVitaminsBariatricGastric bypassMineralsNutritional statusVitamins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.