ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2020
Evaluation of decellularization protocols for production of porcine small intestine submucosa for use in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The functional role of the extracellular matrix in inflammatory bowel disease associated gut fibrosis.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2025Review
- Abdominal wall hernia repair: from prosthetic meshes to smart materials.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Sterilization and disinfection methods for decellularized matrix materials: Review, consideration and proposal.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPorcine-derived acellular biologic grafts are increasingly used in abdominal wall reconstruction and other soft tissue repairs. In a previous work, we have shown porcine small intestine submucosa (PSIS) exhibits clear advantages over porcine pericardium (PPC) and porcine acellular dermal matrix (PADM) in repairing full-thickness abdominal wall defects. In the present study, we aim to determine, quantify, and compare the effects of two most commonly used decellularization protocols on biomechanical and biocompatible properties of PSIS. MATERIALS AND
methodsAfter mechanical preparation, PSIS was treated with either alkaline and acid (AA) protocol or sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) protocol. Cellular content removal, preservation of matrix components, micro- and ultra- structures, and mechanical properties were compared. The host responses were evaluated using PSIS for repairing rat abdominal wall defects. RESULTS AND
conclusionWith regard to the absence of cellular contents, neatly arranged collagen fiber structures, better retention of growth factors, better mechanical strength, lower degrees of local and systemic inflammatory responses, higher degree of vascularization and tissue ingrowth, alkaline and acid protocol exhibits clear advantages over SDS protocol for the preparation of PSIS extracellular matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.