ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2019
Neck of femur fracture: Previous history of malignancy is not an indication to send femoral head for routine histology.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Femoral Head Pathology in Subcapital Hip Fractures: Clinical Value and Cost-Effectiveness in a 230-Patient Case Series.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rethinking Femoral Head Biopsies in Geriatric Hip Fractures: Financial Burden vs Clinical Outcomes.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of full-length femur radiographs in patients with neck of femur fracture and co-existing malignancy.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeck of femur fractures is the most common fractures associated with low-velocity injury in the elderly. Some patients may require further histological examination of the femoral head due clinical suspicion of malignance as a cause of fracture.
objectivesTo review whether standard screening question(s) could be used to identify patients that require histological examinations following neck of femur fracture. STUDY DESIGN AND
methodsFemoral heads sent for histological examination over a period of 5 years were identified from hospital database. All patients presenting acutely with neck of femur fracture above the age of 70 were included, and their case notes were retrospectively reviewed. Reason for histopathological examination were categorised into three screening questions: (Q1) clinical suspicion based on history alone, i.e. neck of femur fracture with no clear history of fall or trauma or preceding hip pain, (Q2) radiological evidence of suspicious abnormality on admission radiographs, (Q3) previous history of malignancy or concurrent malignancy or (Q4) combination of above.
resultsIn total, 119 samples of femoral head were sent and 18 patients had a positive histology. The sensitivity and specificity of these questions individually showed very poor correlation to positive histology with lowest for (Q3) previous history of malignancy (0.39 and 0.51, respectively). However, combining Q1 and Q2 the sensitivity is improved to 1.0 (95% CI 1.0-1.0) and specificity to 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.44) with a positive predictive value of 0.21 (95% CI 0.13-0.30) and negative predictive value of 1.00 (95% CI 1.00-1.00).
conclusionHistory of previous malignancy poorly correlates with positive histology. Routine request based on these screening criteria is not cost-effective in patient management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.