ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019
Outcome and survival following tracheostomy in patients ≥ 85 years old.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frailty indices based on routinely collected data: a scoping review.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2025Article
- Outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy in critically ill elderly patients: a historical cohort study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022Article
- Long-Term Mortality in Critically Ill Tracheostomized Patients Based on Home Mechanical Ventilation at Discharge.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Semi-surgical percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy vs. conventional percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: A prospective randomized trial.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients ≥ 85 years old: its complication rate and possible risk factors. In addition, to assess prognostic factors for short, intermediate and long term survival following the procedure.
methodsA retrospective case-control study of 72 patients ≥ 85 years who received percutaneous dilatation tracheotomy (PTD), compared to a control group of younger patients (n = 182). Demographics, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Survival and risk for complications were analyzed.
resultsThe study group's mean age was 89 ± 4. Twelve patients had complications, three (4.2%) were major. No significant difference was found in overall complication rates between the groups. Cerebrovascular disease with neurologic deficits and pre-procedure albumin levels were significantly associated with complications. Survival rates did not differ in 1 week and 1 month following procedure between study and control group. There was a significant difference in the 1-year survival rates between the patients ≥ 85 years and the control groups (18.1% vs. 34.4%, p = 0.01, respectively). Congestive heart failure, a frailty score > 0.27 and failure to wean from a cannula were associated with reduced 1-year survival.
conclusionPTD is safe for patients ≥ 85 years. Complication risk factors and reduced survival should be discussed with patients and families before conducting tracheostomies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31041516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.