ArticleRheumatology international2019
Indications for bone marrow examinations in rheumatology.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Bone Marrow Imaging in Non-Hematooncological Subjects: Associations with Age, Gender and Other Variables.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematologic involvement or hematologic malignancies are frequently encountered during the course of rheumatic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) aspiration and/or biopsy examinations may have a diagnostic role in explaining hematologic findings detected in rheumatology clinical practice. Our aim was to describe the indications for BM examinations and to share our BM aspiration/biopsy results. We analyzed 140 BM aspiration/biopsy results of patients conducted at the Department of Rheumatology from 2010 to 2018. Demographics, complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) values, serum biochemistry test results including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), organomegaly, indications for BM examinations and BM examination results for each patient, and mortality rates were recorded. Out of the 140 patients, 63.6% were female, and the median (Q1-Q3) age was 53 (39.5-65) years. One hundred fifteen (82.1%) patients were diagnosed as having primary rheumatic disease, and 25 (17.8%) were admitted due to musculoskeletal symptoms. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 34, [29.5%]), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 21, [18.2%]) were the most common rheumatic diseases. Cytopenia was the most common indication for BM aspiration/biopsy (n = 83, [59.3%]). Thirty-nine (47%) of 83 patients had drug-induced cytopenia. A pathology was detected in 40 (28.5%) of the 140 BM examinations. Patients with pathologic BM results had either a hematologic malignancy (n = 38, [95%]) or metastasis to a solid organ (n = 2, [5%]). The group of patients with pathologic BM biopsy results had significantly higher rates of lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, and monoclonal gammopathy compared with the group with non-pathologic results (p = 0.001, p = 0.011, and p = 0.023, respectively). Likewise, LDH concentrations of those with pathologic results were higher than in patients with non-pathologic results [737 (range 577-1420) IU/L vs. 541 (range 306-840) IU/L, p = 0.019]. In this study, cytopenia or CBC abnormalities accompanied by elevated LDH values or anemia along with increased ESR were the most common indications for BM aspiration/biopsy. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the indications of BM aspiration/biopsy and establish the parameters that predict abnormal BM results in rheumatology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31041504What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.