ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2020
[Hybrid operating room : Application in trauma surgery and orthopaedics].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic Intraoperative Imaging in Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery: Initial Clinical Experience With a Self-Driving Mobile 3D C-Arm in the First 300 Cases.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- [Self-driving, fully motorized C-arm in spinal surgery: a comparative study].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- [Camera-based navigation in the hybrid operating room].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Digitalization in orthopaedics: a narrative review.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Comparison of a ceiling-mounted 3D flat panel detector vs. conventional intraoperative 2D fluoroscopy in plate osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures with volar locking plate systems.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor some years now, more and more hospitals in Germany have acquired so-called hybrid operating rooms. In these operating rooms it is possible to produce three-dimensional imaging during the operation. Originally developed for cardiovascular surgery, these rooms are increasingly being used for interdisciplinary purposes. Previous experiences in the use for trauma surgery and orthopedics has shown that three-dimensional imaging can have a positive effect on the success of surgery.
objectiveCan minimally invasive operations on the spine benefit intraoperatively from three-dimensional imaging with respect to operating times and results?
methodsMinimally invasive operations on the spine performed at the UKSH Campus Kiel between 2015 and 2018 in the hybrid operating room were considered. These were compared to minimally invasive spinal surgery performed in conventional operating rooms.
resultsAs is usual with the establishment of a new procedure, there are initially longer operating times. With regular use and appropriate training and experience of the personnel, the processes can be optimized.
conclusionDue to the accuracy of the three-dimensional imaging, errors can be detected and eliminated at an early stage during the operation. Revisions are less frequent. In contrast, there is increased radiation exposure and sometimes longer operation and anesthesia times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31041476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.