Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31041365›Full record

ReviewEndoscopy international open2019

Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marina Lordello Passos, Igor Braga Ribeiro, Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Nádia Korkischko, Gustavo Luis Rodela Silva, Tomazo Prince Franzini, Wanderley Marques Bernando, Eduardo Guimarães Horneaux de Moura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endoscopy international open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy vs. conventional therapy for complex bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. PropofolWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marina Lordello PassosHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Igor Braga RibeiroHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de MouraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nádia KorkischkoHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gustavo Luis Rodela SilvaHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Tomazo Prince FranziniHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wanderley Marques BernandoHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.
Eduardo Guimarães Horneaux de MouraHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HC/FMUSP, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID31041365
PMCPMC6447404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.