Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31041348›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Randomized Trial of Ceftazidime-Avibactam vs Meropenem for Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (REPROVE): Analyses per US FDA-Specified End Points.

Antoni Torres, Doug Rank, David Melnick, Ludmyla Rekeda, Xiang Chen, Todd Riccobene, Ian A Critchley, Hassan D Lakkis, Dianna Taylor, Angela K Talley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Efficacy of Ceftazidime-avibactam in treating Gram-negative infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Carbapenem-ResistantMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. [Clinical experience using cefiderocol].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023
    Review
  17. Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Antoni TorresServei de Pneumologia, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERES, ICREA Academia, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Doug RankClinical Development, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
David MelnickClinical Development, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
Ludmyla RekedaBiostatistics, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
Xiang ChenBiostatistics, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
Todd RiccobeneClinical Pharmacology, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
Ian A CritchleyClinical Microbiology, Allergan plc, Irvine, California.
Hassan D LakkisBiostatistics, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.
Dianna TaylorTaylormade Health Ltd, Warrington, UK.
Angela K TalleyClinical Development, Allergan plc, Madison, New Jersey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP; nosocomial pneumonia) due to Gram-negative pathogens are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; treatment options for multidrug-resistant infections are limited. The pivotal phase III REPROVE trial evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) vs meropenem in the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Study results for prespecified analyses per US Food and Drug Administration-recommended trial end points are reported here.

methodsHospitalized adults with HAP/VAP proven or suspected to be caused by a Gram-negative pathogen were randomized 1:1 to receive CAZ-AVI or meropenem for 7 to 14 days. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the ITT and microbiological ITT (micro-ITT) populations, and safety and tolerability throughout the study.

resultshundred seventy randomized patients received treatment and were included in the ITT population (CAZ-AVI, n = 436; meropenem, n = 434). CAZ-AVI was noninferior to meropenem for the primary end point (28-day all-cause mortality; ITT) based on the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 9.6%; meropenem, 8.3%; difference, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.4% to 5.3%) and for the clinical cure end point in the ITT population based on a prespecified -10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 67.2%; meropenem, 69.1%; difference, -1.9%; 95% CI, -8.1% to 4.3%). Clinical cure rates at TOC for patients infected with CAZ-nonsusceptible pathogens were similar (CAZ-AVI, 75.5%; meropenem, 71.2%; micro-ITT). Safety data were consistent with established safety profiles for both agents.

conclusionsCAZ-AVI provides an important new treatment option for HAP/VAP due to Gram-negative pathogens, including CAZ-nonsusceptible strains.

Indexed as

ceftazidime-avibactamhospital-acquired pneumoniameropenemnosocomial pneumoniaventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID31041348
PMCPMC6483139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.