Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31041156›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Tracking neonicotinoids following their use as cotton seed treatments.

Kristina L Kohl, Lauren K Harrell, Joseph F Mudge, Seenivasan Subbiah, John Kasumba, Etem Osma, Apurba K Barman, Todd A Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Physiological Responses of the FireflyFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristina L KohlDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Lauren K HarrellTexas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, Wharton, TX, USA.
Joseph F MudgeDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Seenivasan SubbiahDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
John KasumbaDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Etem OsmaBiology Department, Erzincan Binali Yildirim University, Erzincan, Erzincan Province, Turkey.
Apurba K BarmanDepartment of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA.
Todd A AndersonDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonicotinoids are a leading class of insecticides on the global market, accounting for nearly 25%. They are widely used in both agricultural and residential settings. Causing neuron failure by irreversibly binding to the insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, neonicotinoids offer broad spectrum efficacy against a variety of pests. However, because they are non-selective with regard to insect species, there has been some concern with neonicotinoid use over threats to pollinators such as honeybees, and potential indirect effects to migratory waterfowl as a result of invertebrate prey population depletion. In order to study occurrence and fate of neonicotinoids (thiamethoxam and imidacloprid), we analyzed cotton leaves on plants grown from neonicotinoid-treated seeds and corresponding soil samples between cotton rows. Neonicotinoid concentration data from cotton leaves appears to be consistent with the claim that seed treatments protect plants for 3-4 weeks; by 30 days post-planting, neonicotinoid concentrations fell, in general, to 200 ng/g or lower. This represents about a 10-fold decrease from plant concentrations at approximately 2 weeks post-planting. It was found that neonicotinoids used as seed treatments remained present in the soil for months post planting and could be available for runoff. To that end, 21 playa wetlands were sampled; 10 had at least one quantifiable neonicotinoid present, three of which were classified as grassland or rangeland playas, two were urban, and the remaining five were cropland playas. In several instances, neonicotinoid concentrations in playas exceeded EPA chronic benchmarks for aquatic invertebrates.

Indexed as

ClothianidinEnvironmental fateImidaclopridPlant uptakePlaya wetlandRunoffThiamethoxam

Identifiers

PMID31041156
PMCPMC6476295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.