ReviewClinical liver disease2016
Risk stratification and preoperative evaluation of the patient with known or suspected liver disease.
Review in Clinical liver disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of Endoscopy in Cirrhosis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Preoperative risk evaluation and optimization for patients with liver disease.Gastroenterology report · 2024Review
- Assessing Patients with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency for Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Review and Clinical Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Review of Pertinent Considerations.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Review
- Hepatobiliary Quiz Answers - 18 (2016).Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology · 2016Article
- Surgical Risk Assessment in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
- Anesthetic Management for Prolonged Incidental Surgery in Advanced Liver Disease.Anesthesia, essays and researchesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.