Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040895›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2019

Predictive factors of histological response of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Chloé Serayssol, Charlotte Maulat, Florence Breibach, Fatima-Zohra Mokrane, Janick Selves, Rosine Guimbaud, Philippe Otal, Bertrand Suc, Emilie Berard, Fabrice Muscari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chloé SerayssolDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Charlotte MaulatDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France. charlotte.maulat@gmail.com.
Florence BreibachDepartment of Pathology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Fatima-Zohra MokraneDepartment of Radiology, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Janick SelvesDepartment of Pathology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Rosine GuimbaudDepartment of Oncology, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Philippe OtalDepartment of Radiology, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Bertrand SucDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.
Emilie BerardThe Toulouse Research Methodology Support Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse 31000, France.
Fabrice MuscariDepartment of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Toulouse-Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse 31059, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second most common in women worldwide. Almost a third of the patients has or will develop liver metastases. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has recently become nearly systematic prior to surgery of colorectal livers metastases (CRLMs). The response to NAC is evaluated by radiological imaging according to morphological criteria. More recently, the response to NAC has been evaluated based on histological criteria of the resected specimen. The most often used score is the tumor regression grade (TRG), which considers the necrosis, fibrosis, and number of viable tumor cells.

aimTo analyze the predictive factors of the histological response, according to the TRG, on CRLM surgery performed after NAC.

methodsFrom January 2006 to December 2013, 150 patients who had underwent surgery for CRLMs after NAC were included. The patients were separated into two groups based on their histological response, according to Rubbia-Brandt TRG. Based on their TRG, each patient was either assigned to the responder (R) group (TRG 1, 2, and 3) or to the non-responder (NR) group (TRG 4 and 5). All of the histology slides were re-evaluated in a blind manner by the same specialized pathologist. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

resultsSeventy-four patients were classified as responders and 76 as non-responders. The postoperative mortality rate was 0.7%, with a complication rate of 38%. Multivariate analysis identified five predictive factors of histological response. Three were predictive of non-response: More than seven NAC sessions, the absence of a radiological response after NAC, and a repeat hepatectomy (

conclusionA non-radiological response and a number of NAC sessions > 7 are the two most pertinent predictive factors of non-histological response (TRG 4 or 5).

Indexed as

Colorectal liver metastasisHepatectomyHistological responseLiver surgeryNeoadjuvant chemotherapyTumor regression grade

Identifiers

PMID31040895
PMCPMC6475675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.