ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy2019
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in special locations.
Review in World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemoclip-suture-rubber band traction improves efficiency of colonic ESD: a randomized controlled trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Trial
- A Practical Endoscopic Treatment Strategy for Appendiceal Orifice Lesions Using Forceps-Assisted Polypectomy (Strip Biopsy).Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Challenges, innovations, and the road ahead.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Safety and performance of the HYBRIDknife flex in a porcine model of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A pilot study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- The role of advanced endoscopy in appendiceal polyp management and outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Performance of a Novel Hybrid-Technology Knife in an Animal Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered one of the most challenging endoscopic procedures for novice endoscopists. When compared with the stomach, the colon and rectum have a narrower tubular lumen, greater angulation at the flexures, and a thinner muscle layer. These factors make endoscopic control and maneuverability difficult. ESD of the colorectum was considered more difficult than gastric and esophageal ESD. However, with learning from the experts, practicing, and selecting an appropriate technique, most of colorectal ESD could be performed successfully. Nevertheless, some colorectal locations are extremely specialized either from unique anatomy or given unstable scope position. Accordingly, the objective of this review was to provide endoscopists with an overview of the techniques and outcomes associated with ESD at these special colorectal locations. ESD at the discussed special locations of the ileo-colo-rectum was found to be feasible, and outcomes were comparable to those of ESD performed in non-special locations of the ileo-colo-rectum. Practice for skill improvement and awareness of the unique characteristics of each special location is the key to performing successful ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.