Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040880›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2019

Longitudinal cortical network reorganization in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Vinzenz Fleischer, Nabin Koirala, Amgad Droby, René-Maxime Gracien, Ralf Deichmann, Ulf Ziemann, Sven G Meuth, Muthuraman Muthuraman, Frauke Zipp, Sergiu Groppa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Graph theoretical approach to brain remodeling in multiple sclerosis.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vinzenz FleischerDepartment of Neurology and Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-5121
Nabin KoiralaDepartment of Neurology and Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Amgad DrobyDepartment of Neurology and Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
René-Maxime GracienDepartment of Neurology, and Brain Imaging Center, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ralf DeichmannBrain Imaging Center, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ulf ZiemannDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
Sven G MeuthDepartment of Neurology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Muthuraman MuthuramanDepartment of Neurology and Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Frauke ZippDepartment of Neurology and Neuroimaging Center (NIC) of the Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sergiu GroppaNeuroimaging and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), Rhine-Main-Neuroscience Network (rmn), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNetwork science provides powerful access to essential organizational principles of the brain. The aim of this study was to investigate longitudinal evolution of gray matter networks in early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) compared with healthy controls (HCs) and contrast network dynamics with conventional atrophy measurements.

methodsFor our longitudinal study, we investigated structural cortical networks over 1 year derived from 3T MRI in 203 individuals (92 early RRMS patients with mean disease duration of 12.1 ± 14.5 months and 101 HCs). Brain networks were computed based on cortical thickness inter-regional correlations and fed into graph theoretical analysis. Network connectivity measures (modularity, clustering coefficient, local efficiency, and transitivity) were compared between patients and HCs, and between patients with and without disease activity. Moreover, we calculated longitudinal brain volume changes and cortical atrophy patterns.

resultsOur analyses revealed strengthening of local network properties shown by increased modularity, clustering coefficient, local efficiency, and transitivity over time. These network dynamics were not detectable in the cortex of HCs over the same period and occurred independently of patients' disease activity. Most notably, the described network reorganization was evident beyond detectable atrophy as characterized by conventional morphometric methods.

conclusionIn conclusion, our findings provide evidence for gray matter network reorganization subsequent to clinical disease manifestation in patients with early RRMS. An adaptive cortical response with increased local network characteristics favoring network segregation could play a primordial role for maintaining brain function in response to neuroinflammation.

Indexed as

graph theorymodularitymultiple sclerosisnetwork neurosciencereorganizationstructural covariance

Identifiers

PMID31040880
PMCPMC6482642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.