Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040601›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Effects of fluid absorption following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Changes in blood cell indices and electrolytes.

Dipti Saxena, Divyangna Sapra, Atul Dixit, Saurabh Chipde, Santosh Agarwal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dipti SaxenaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences and MOHAK Hi-Tech Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Divyangna SapraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences and MOHAK Hi-Tech Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Atul DixitDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences and MOHAK Hi-Tech Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Saurabh ChipdeDepartment of Urology, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences and MOHAK Hi-Tech Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Santosh AgarwalConsultant Urology, Bansal Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEffects of fluid absorption on hematological profile in the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) have not been given due importance. Considering the limited number of studies available, we conducted this study to evaluate the changes in hemodynamics, complete blood count (CBC), and electrolytes in patients undergoing PCNL using normal saline for irrigation in the prone position. Furthermore, we evaluated the common factors known to affect the absorption. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty American Society of Anesthesiologist Class I or II patients aged 18-65 years were recruited who underwent PCNL under general anesthesia. Heart rate, blood pressure (BP), CBC, and serum electrolytes were recorded preoperatively and just before extubation and compared using the Student's

resultsThere was a statistically significant fall in mean hemoglobin (12.5 g/dL to 11.5 g/dL), packed cell volume (38.6%-35.6%), platelet count (2.9 × 10

conclusionThis study reveals that there is a significant fall in hemoglobin and Na

Indexed as

Electrolytesfluid absorptionhematologypercutaneous nephrolithotomypostoperative

Identifiers

PMID31040601
PMCPMC6476206
OpenAlexW2922464238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.