Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040570›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2019

Stimulation of non-specific immunity, gene expression, and disease resistance in Nile Tilapia,

Omita Yengkhom, Konda Subramanian Shalini, P A Subramani, R Dinakaran Michael

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Characteristics ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  3. Dietary supplementation ofFish and shellfish immunology reports · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immune response evaluation inVeterinary world · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omita YengkhomCentre for Fish Immunology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Konda Subramanian ShaliniCentre for Fish Immunology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
P A SubramaniCentre for Fish Immunology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
R Dinakaran MichaelCentre for Fish Immunology, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vels University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe objective of the present study was to test the immunostimulating potential of marine macroalga, MATERIALS AND

methods

resultsCSME increased serum lysozyme, myeloperoxidase, and antiprotease activities. There was an increase in the expression of lysozyme gene in the spleen of treated fish. Mid dose of CSME caused the minimum mortality of 10% (consequent relative percentage survival = 73) which is comparable to that of the positive control.

conclusionCSME is considered to have the potential to be developed into an immunostimulant for finfish aquaculture.

Indexed as

Aeromonas hydrophilaCaulerpa scalpelliformisimmunostimulantmacroalgaOreochromis niloticus

Identifiers

PMID31040570
PMCPMC6460875
OpenAlexW2913774467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.