ArticleVeterinary world2019
Investigation of
Article in Veterinary world, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiology and Diversity of Paratuberculosis in the Arabian Peninsula: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Implications for One Health.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Seroprevalence and risk factors of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dromedary camels of Southern Punjab, Pakistan.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Preliminary investigation on the seroprevalence and co-exposure of Brucella spp. and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in dromedary camels from the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive genome analysis ofVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Clinical insights on paratuberculosis in Arabian camels (Open veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Pathological, microscopic, and molecular diagnosis of paratuberculosis/John's disease in naturally infected dromedary camel (Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Article
- First identification ofVeterinary world · 2022Article
- Serological and Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Seroprevalence of anti-Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis antibodies in female sheep in Tunisia.Veterinary medicine and science · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimMATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 30 Arabian camels (
resultsFive MAP isolates were recovered from these investigated camel samples giving an isolation rate of 16.6%, while eight camels were identified by PCR (26.6%). Five camels yielded MAP in their feces by ZN fecal staining (16.6%), whereas ELISA detected anti-MAP antibodies in nine camels only (30%).
conclusionFrom the obtained results, we concluded that the gold standard for the diagnosis of MAP is the culture method despite its limitations. Molecular diagnosis (PCR) could be a useful tool in the identification of truly positive and negative camels; however, great care should be given regarding the primers specificity and sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.