Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040238›Full record

ArticlemBio2019

Isolation and Characterization of Live Yeast Cells from Ancient Vessels as a Tool in Bio-Archaeology.

Tzemach Aouizerat, Itai Gutman, Yitzhak Paz, Aren M Maeir, Yuval Gadot, Daniel Gelman, Amir Szitenberg, Elyashiv Drori, Ania Pinkus, Miriam Schoemann and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A universally applicable definition for domestication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Water is a preservative of microbes.Microbial biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Alcohol-Related Liver Disease.Clinical liver disease · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Comparison of TwoFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tzemach AouizeratInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Itai GutmanInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yitzhak PazIsrael Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel.
Aren M MaeirTell es-Safi/Gath Archaeological Project, The Martin (Szusz) Department of Land of Israel and Archaeology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Yuval GadotTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Daniel GelmanInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amir SzitenbergMicrobial Metagenomics Division, Dead Sea and Arava Science Center, Masada, Israel.
Elyashiv DroriDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Ariel University and Eastern R&D Center, Ariel, Israel.
Ania PinkusDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Ariel University and Eastern R&D Center, Ariel, Israel.
Miriam SchoemannInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Rachel KaplanInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tziona Ben-GedalyaDepartment of Molecular Biology, Ariel University and Eastern R&D Center, Ariel, Israel.
Shunit Coppenhagen-GlazerInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Eli ReichInstitute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Amijai SaragoviLautenberg Center for Immunology and Cancer Research, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Oded LipschitsTel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michael Klutstein *Institute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel michaelk@ekmd.huji.ac.il ronenh@ekmd.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0002-4041-3112
Ronen Hazan *Institute of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel michaelk@ekmd.huji.ac.il ronenh@ekmd.huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-9967-730X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient fermented food has been studied based on recipes, residue analysis, and ancient-DNA techniques and reconstructed using modern domesticated yeast. Here, we present a novel approach based on our hypothesis that enriched yeast populations in fermented beverages could have become the dominant species in storage vessels and their descendants could be isolated and studied today. We developed a pipeline of yeast isolation from clay vessels and screened for yeast cells in beverage-related and non-beverage-related ancient vessels and sediments from several archaeological sites. We found that yeast cells could be successfully isolated specifically from clay containers of fermented beverages. The findings that genotypically the isolated yeasts are similar to those found in traditional African beverages and phenotypically they grow similar to modern beer-producing yeast strongly suggest that they are descendants of the original fermenting yeast. These results demonstrate that modern microorganisms can serve as a new tool in bio-archaeology research.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyFossilsGenotypeGeologic SedimentsMicrobiological TechniquesYeastsancient fermented food and beveragesancient pottery vesselsbeerbio-archaeologyexperimental archaeologyyeasts

Identifiers

PMID31040238
PMCPMC6495373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.