Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31040191›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN2019

One-Time Fecal Immunochemical Screening for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Patients with CKD (DETECT Study).

Germaine Wong, Richard L Hope, Kirsten Howard, Jeremy R Chapman, Antoni Castells, Simon D Roger, Michael J Bourke, Petra Macaskill, Robin Turner, Gabrielle Williams and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of kidney transplant suitability for patients with prior cancers: is it time for a rethink?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Germaine WongSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, germaine.wong@health.nsw.gov.au.
Richard L HopeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Kirsten HowardSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Jeremy R ChapmanCentre for Transplant and Renal Research, and.
Antoni CastellsGastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8431-2033
Simon D RogerDepartment of Renal Medicine, Gosford Hospital, Gosford, Australia.
Michael J BourkeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Petra MacaskillSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Robin TurnerSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Gabrielle WilliamsSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Wai Hon LimDepartment of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Charmaine E LokDepartment of Renal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.
Fritz DiekmannDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Clinical and Provincial Hospital of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nicholas B CrossDepartment of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Shaundeep SenDepartment of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, Australia.
Richard D M AllenDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Steven J ChadbanDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Carol A PollockDepartment of Medicine, Northern Clinical School, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Armando Teixeira-PintoSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Jean Y H YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, and.
Narelle WilliamsSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Eric Hoi Kit AuSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-5913
Anh KieuSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Laura JamesSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health.
Jonathan C CraigCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUSydney Local Health District · AUMetabolism and Renal Physiology · FRSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AUWestmead Hospital · AUCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUFlinders University · AUGosford Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with CKD, the risk of developing colorectal cancer is high and outcomes are poor. Screening using fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is effective in reducing mortality from colorectal cancer, but performance characteristics of FIT in CKD are unknown.

methodsTo determine the detection rates and performance characteristics of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN) in patients with CKD, we used FIT to prospectively screen patients aged 35-74 years with CKD (stages 3-5 CKD, dialysis, and renal transplant) from 11 sites in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and Spain. All participants received clinical follow-up at 2 years. We used a two-step reference standard approach to estimate disease status.

resultsOverall, 369 out of 1706 patients who completed FIT (21.6%) tested positive; 323 (87.5%) underwent colonoscopies. A total of 1553 (91.0%) completed follow-up; 82 (4.8%) had died and 71 (4.2%) were lost. The detection rate of ACN using FIT was 6.0% (5.6%, 7.4%, and 5.6% for stages 3-5 CKD, dialysis, and transplant). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FIT for ACN were 0.90, 0.83, 0.30, and 0.99, respectively. Of participants who underwent colonoscopy, five (1.5%) experienced major colonoscopy-related complications, including bowel perforation and major bleeding.

conclusionsFIT appears to be an accurate screening test for patients with CKD, such that a negative test may rule out the diagnosis of colorectal cancer within 2 years. However, the risk of major complications from work-up colonoscopy are at least ten-fold higher than in the general population.

Indexed as

Cause of DeathAdultAgedAustraliaCanadaCohort StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryInternationalityMaleMass Screeningcancerchronic kidney diseasescreeningtest performance

Identifiers

PMID31040191
PMCPMC6551781
OpenAlexW2942674218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.