ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2019
Enhanced in vitro model of the CSF dynamics.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic compliance of the CSF system in iNPH (Part I) - in vitro investigation of the impact of spinal canal stenoses.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- A novel method of fabricating dynamic, heterogenous benchtop lateral and third ventricle phantoms from MRI of hydrocephalus patients: a verification and validation study.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Molecular hallmarks of hydrocephalus.Science translational medicine · 2025Review
- Intraoperative ultrasound in spinal surgery for surgical tailoring and control - A single center case series.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Recapitulation of physiologic and pathophysiologic pulsatile CSF flow in purpose-built high-throughput hydrocephalus bioreactors.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024Article
- Differential Lipid Signatures of Lumbar and Cisternal Cerebrospinal Fluid.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Article
- Cortical atrophy in chronic subdural hematoma from ultra-structures to physical properties.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Differential proteomic profile of lumbar and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2023Article
- Article
- Long-term recovery behavior of brain tissue in hydrocephalus patients after shunting.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Human intracranial pulsatility during the cardiac cycle: a computational modelling framework.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2022Article
- Computational fluid dynamics model to predict the dynamical behavior of the cerebrospinal fluid through implementation of physiological boundary conditions.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Advances and Applications in the Management of Chronic Pain Patient.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Review of Design Considerations for Brain-on-a-Chip Models.Micromachines · 2021Review
- CNS fluid and solute movement: physiology, modelling and imaging.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2020Article
- AnEuropean journal of mechanics. B, FluidsArticle
- Current progress and challenges in the development of brain tissue models: How to grow up the changeable brain in vitro?Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFluid dynamics of the craniospinal system are complex and still not completely understood. In vivo flow and pressure measurements of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are limited. Whereas in silico modeling can be an adequate pathway for parameter studies, in vitro modeling of the craniospinal system is essential for testing and evaluation of therapeutic measures associated with innovative implants relating to, for example, normal pressure hydrocephalus and other fluid disorders. Previously-reported in vitro models focused on the investigation of only one hypothesis of the fluid dynamics rather than developing a modular set-up to allow changes in focus of the investigation. The aim of this study is to present an enhanced and validated in vitro model of the CSF system which enables the future embedding of implants, the validation of in silico models or phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) measurements and a variety of sensitivity analyses regarding pathological behavior, such as reduced CSF compliances, higher resistances or altered blood dynamics.
methodsThe in vitro model consists of a ventricular system which is connected via the aqueduct to the cranial and spinal subarachnoid spaces. Two compliance chambers are integrated to cushion the arteriovenous blood flow generated by a cam plate unit enabling the modeling of patient specific flow dynamics. The CSF dynamics are monitored using three cranial pressure sensors and a spinal ultrasound flow meter. Measurements of the in vitro spinal flow were compared to cervical flow data recorded with PC-MRI from nine healthy young volunteers, and pressure measurements were compared to the literature values reported for intracranial pressure (ICP) to validate the newly developed in vitro model.
resultsThe maximum spinal CSF flow recorded in the in vitro simulation was 133.60 ml/min in the caudal direction and 68.01 ml/min in the cranial direction, whereas the PC-MRI flow data of the subjects showed 122.82 ml/min in the caudal and 77.86 ml/min in the cranial direction. In addition, the mean ICP (in vitro) was 12.68 mmHg and the pressure wave amplitude, 4.86 mmHg, which is in the physiological range.
conclusionsThe in vitro pressure values were in the physiological range. The amplitudes of the flow results were in good agreement with PC-MRI data of young and healthy volunteers. However, the maximum cranial flow in the in vitro model occurred earlier than in the PC-MRI data, which might be due to a lack of an in vitro dynamic compliance. Implementing dynamic compliances and related sensitivity analyses are major aspects of our ongoing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.