ArticleJournal of ovarian research2019
Narrowing the field: cancer-specific promoters for mitochondrially-targeted p53-BH3 fusion gene therapy in ovarian cancer.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Punicalagin Inhibits the Growth and Proliferation of Ovarian Epithelial Adenocarcinoma Cells Via Apoptosis and Autophagic Cell Death.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- Development of 3D Cell-Based Fluorescent Reporter Assay for Screening of Drugs Downregulating Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing breast cancer diagnosis with a near-infrared fluorescence imaging smart sensor for estrogen/progesterone receptor detection.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Suicide gene strategies applied in ovarian cancer studies.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Review
- Article
- Targeting Cancer with CRISPR/Cas9-Based Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- STOP Codon Mutations at Sites of Natural Caspase Cleavage Are Implicated in Autism and Alzheimer's Disease: The Case of ADNP.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- p53-Bad: A Novel Tumor Suppressor/Proapoptotic Factor Hybrid Directed to the Mitochondria for Ovarian Cancer Gene Therapy.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2019Article
- Protective Effects of Polydatin on Reproductive Injury Induced by Ionizing Radiation.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite years of research, the treatment options and mortality rate for ovarian cancer remain relatively stagnant. Resistance to chemotherapy and high heterogeneity in mutations contribute to ovarian cancer's lethality, including many mutations in tumor suppressor p53. Though wild type p53 gene therapy clinical trials failed in ovarian cancer, mitochondrially-targeted p53 fusion constructs, including a fusion with pro-apoptotic protein Bad, have shown much higher apoptotic potential than wild type p53 in vitro. Due to the inherent toxicities of mitochondrial apoptosis, cancer-specificity for the p53 fusion constructs must be developed. Cancer-specific promoters such as hTERT, hTC, Brms1, and Ran have shown promise in ovarian cancer.
resultsOf five different lengths of hTERT promoter, the - 279/+ 5 length relative to the transcription start site showed the highest activity across a panel of ovarian cancer cells. In addition to - 279/+ 5, promoters hTC (an hTERT/CMV promoter hybrid), Brms1, and Ran were tested as drivers of mitochondrially-targeted p53-Bad and p53-Bad* fusion gene therapy constructs. p53-Bad* displayed cancer-specific killing in all ovarian cancer cell lines when driven by hTC, - 279/+ 5, or Brms1.
conclusionsCancer-specific promoters hTC, - 279/+ 5, and Brms1 all display promise in driving p53-Bad* gene therapy for treatment of ovarian cancer and should be moved forward into in vivo studies. -279/+ 5 displays lower expression levels in fewer cells, but greater cancer specificity, rendering it most useful for gene therapeutics with high toxicity to normal cells. hTC and Brms1 show higher transfection and expression levels with some cancer specificity, making them ideal for lowering toxicity in order to increase dose without as much of a reduction in the number of cancer cells expressing the gene construct. Having a variety of promoters available means that patient genetic testing can aid in choosing a promoter, thereby increasing cancer-specificity and giving patients with ovarian cancer a greater chance at survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.