Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039742›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Reliable heritability estimation using sparse regularization in ultrahigh dimensional genome-wide association studies.

Xin Li, Dongya Wu, Yue Cui, Bing Liu, Henrik Walter, Gunter Schumann, Chong Li, Tianzi Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Minimax Rates ofEntropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xin LiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, 310027, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7536-6782
Dongya WuBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 East Zhongguancun Road, Beijing, 100190, China.
Yue CuiBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 East Zhongguancun Road, Beijing, 100190, China.
Bing LiuBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 East Zhongguancun Road, Beijing, 100190, China.
Henrik WalterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gunter SchumannCentre for Population Neuroscience and Stratified Medicine (PONS) and MRC-SGDP Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chong LiSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Tianzi JiangBrainnetome Center, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 95 East Zhongguancun Road, Beijing, 100190, China. jiangtz@nlpr.ia.ac.cn.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z161100000216152, Z161100000216139Guangdong Pearl River Talents Plan 2016ZT06S220National Key R\&D Program of China 2017YFA0105203National Natural Science Foundation of China 11571308Natural Science Foundation of China 31771076Natural Science Foundation of China 91432302, 31620103905Science Frontier Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences QYZDJ-SSW-SMC019Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China LY18A010004, LY17A010021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been used to estimate the heritability of human complex traits in recent years. Existing methods are based on the linear mixed model, with the assumption that the genetic effects are random variables, which is opposite to the fixed effect assumption embedded in the framework of quantitative genetics theory. Moreover, heritability estimators provided by existing methods may have large standard errors, which calls for the development of reliable and accurate methods to estimate heritability.

resultsIn this paper, we first investigate the influences of the fixed and random effect assumption on heritability estimation, and prove that these two assumptions are equivalent under mild conditions in the theoretical aspect. Second, we propose a two-stage strategy by first performing sparse regularization via cross-validated elastic net, and then applying variance estimation methods to construct reliable heritability estimations. Results on both simulated data and real data show that our strategy achieves a considerable reduction in the standard error while reserving the accuracy.

conclusionsThe proposed strategy allows for a reliable and accurate heritability estimation using GWAS data. It shows the promising future that reliable estimations can still be obtained with even a relatively restricted sample size, and should be especially useful for large-scale heritability analyses in the genomics era.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansHeritabilityReliable estimationSimulationSparse regularizationStandard error

Identifiers

PMID31039742
PMCPMC6492418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.