Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039676›Full record

ArticleOpen biology2019

Regulators of cell movement during development and regeneration in Drosophila.

Monn Monn Myat, Dheveline Louis, Andreas Mavrommatis, Latoya Collins, Jamal Mattis, Michelle Ledru, Shilpi Verghese, Tin Tin Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Newer Methods Drive Recent Insights into Rab GTPase Biology: An Overview.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Rabs in Signaling and Embryonic Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monn Monn Myat1 Department of Biology, Medgar Evers College, City University of New York , Brooklyn, NY 11225 , USA.
Dheveline Louis1 Department of Biology, Medgar Evers College, City University of New York , Brooklyn, NY 11225 , USA.
Andreas Mavrommatis1 Department of Biology, Medgar Evers College, City University of New York , Brooklyn, NY 11225 , USA.
Latoya Collins1 Department of Biology, Medgar Evers College, City University of New York , Brooklyn, NY 11225 , USA.
Jamal Mattis1 Department of Biology, Medgar Evers College, City University of New York , Brooklyn, NY 11225 , USA.
Michelle Ledru2 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado , Boulder, CO 80309-0347 , USA.
Shilpi Verghese2 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado , Boulder, CO 80309-0347 , USA.
Tin Tin Su2 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado , Boulder, CO 80309-0347 , USA.
City University of New York · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Cellular Plasticity and Regeneration after Radiation Damage in DrosophilaR35GM130374 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Tin Tin Su · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
Medgar Evers College Research Initiative for Scientific EnhancementR25GM105553 · NIGMS · MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE · PI NUR-E-KAMAL, ALAM, PATWARY, MOHSIN U. · 2014 to 2019
$2.4M
Consequences of Cell Death in DrosophilaR01GM106317 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SU, TIN TIN · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106317NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM105553NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration is a fundamental cell biological process essential both for normal development and for tissue regeneration after damage. Cells can migrate individually or as a collective. To better understand the genetic requirements for collective migration, we expressed RNA interference (RNAi) against 30 genes in the Drosophila embryonic salivary gland cells that are known to migrate collectively. The genes were selected based on their effect on cell and membrane morphology, cytoskeleton and cell adhesion in cell culture-based screens or in Drosophila tissues other than salivary glands. Of these, eight disrupted salivary gland migration, targeting: Rac2, Rab35 and Rab40 GTPases, MAP kinase-activated kinase-2 (MAPk-AK2), RdgA diacylglycerol kinase, Cdk9, the PDSW subunit of NADH dehydrogenase (ND-PDSW) and actin regulator Enabled (Ena). The same RNAi lines were used to determine their effect during regeneration of X-ray-damaged larval wing discs. Cells translocate during this process, but it remained unknown whether they do so by directed cell divisions, by cell migration or both. We found that RNAi targeting Rac2, MAPk-AK2 and RdgA disrupted cell translocation during wing disc regeneration, but RNAi against Ena and ND-PDSW had little effect. We conclude that, in Drosophila, cell movements in development and regeneration have common as well as distinct genetic requirements.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell MovementCells, CulturedDiacylglycerol KinaseDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMAP Kinase Signaling SystemRAC2 GTP-Binding Proteinrac GTP-Binding ProteinsRegenerationRNA InterferenceSalivary GlandsWings, AnimalDiacylglycerol KinaseDrosophila ProteinsRAC2 GTP-Binding Proteinrac GTP-Binding ProteinsRdgA protein, Drosophilacell migrationDrosophilaradiationregenerationsalivary glandwing disc

Identifiers

PMID31039676
PMCPMC6544984
OpenAlexW2943186194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.