Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039359›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2019

How the motor system integrates with working memory.

Cherie L Marvel, Owen P Morgan, Sharif I Kronemer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Neural signatures of serial order access in verbal working memory.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Movement-related cortical potentials underlying motor preparation and execution in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cherie L MarvelDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: cmarvel1@jhmi.edu.
Owen P MorganDepartment of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sharif I KronemerDepartment of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USYale University · US

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGY OF CORTICAL SYSTEMST32NS007224 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CARDIN, JESSICA A · 1985 to 2025
$4.6M
HIV-Related Neuroplasticity and Attention-to-Reward as Predictors of Real World FunctionR01DA041264 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARVEL, CHERIE L · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Cerebro-Cerebellar Contributions to Cognitive Function in Drug AddictionK01DA030442 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARVEL, CHERIE L · 2010 to 2014
$849k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA030442NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041264NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is vital for basic functions in everyday life. During working memory, one holds a finite amount of information in mind until it is no longer required or when resources to maintain this information are depleted. Convergence of neuroimaging data indicates that working memory is supported by the motor system, and in particular, by regions that are involved in motor planning and preparation, in the absence of overt movement. These "secondary motor" regions are physically located between primary motor and non-motor regions, within the frontal lobe, cerebellum, and basal ganglia, creating a functionally organized gradient. The contribution of secondary motor regions to working memory may be to generate internal motor traces that reinforce the representation of information held in mind. The primary aim of this review is to elucidate motor-cognitive interactions through the lens of working memory using the Sternberg paradigm as a model and to suggest origins of the motor-cognitive interface. In addition, we discuss the implications of the motor-cognitive relationship for clinical groups with motor network deficits.

Indexed as

Basal GangliaCerebellumHumansMemory, Short-TermMotor CortexMovement DisordersNerve NetBasal gangliaCerebellumCognitionFMRIMotorMotor traceMovement disordersPremotor cortexSternbergSupplementary motor areaWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID31039359
PMCPMC6604620
OpenAlexW2942247057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.