Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

BRAF immunohistochemistry predicts sentinel lymph node involvement in intermediate thickness melanomas.

Atte A Manninen, Maria Gardberg, Susanna Juteau, Suvi Ilmonen, Joonas Jukonen, Noora Andersson, Olli Carpén

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Tissue Biomarkers Predicting Lymph Node Status in Cutaneous Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Atte A ManninenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Maria GardbergInstitute of Biomedicine, Research Center for Cancer, Infections and Immunity, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Susanna JuteauDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Suvi IlmonenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Joonas JukonenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Noora AnderssonDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli CarpénDepartment of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FITurku University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an important step in melanoma staging and prognostication. It is commonly performed for patients with intermediate thickness melanomas, based on clinicopathological features. However, only 20-25% of patients eventually demonstrate nodal involvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether tissue biomarkers with links to melanoma biology, together with clinicopathological parameters, could aid in the prediction of sentinel node involvement and improve selection of patients for SNB. In addition, we examined the role of these clinical or biological markers in disease outcome.

methodsWe collected a case-control cohort of 140 intermediate thickness (Breslow 0,9-4,0mm) melanoma patients with or without SNB involvement matched for age, gender, Breslow thickness and location. From this cohort, we tested the predictive value of common clinicopathological parameters (ulceration, mitotic count and tumor regression) and FMNL-2, ezrin and BRAF V600E immunoreactivity, for sentinel node involvement and survival. We further analyzed the correlations in the superficial spreading melanoma subtype.

resultsBased on our case control analysis, of the markers, BRAF V600E status (p = 0.010) and mitotic count (p = 0.036) correlated with SNB involvement. SNB status was a strong independent prognosticator for recurrence free survival (RFS p<0.001), melanoma specific survival (MSS p = 0.000) and overall survival (OS p = 0.029). In the superficially spreading melanoma subgroup, BRAF V600E positivity indicated poorer RFS (p = 0.039) and OS (p = 0.012). By combining the Breslow thickness, mitotic count and BRAF immunohistochemistry, we identified a group of superficially spreading melanomas with an excellent survival probability independent of SNB status.

conclusionsThese results demonstrate that BRAF immunohistochemistry could serve as a useful addition to a marker panel for selecting intermediate thickness melanoma patients for SNB.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleForminsHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafRisk FactorsSentinel Lymph NodeFMNL2 protein, humanForminsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID31039200
PMCPMC6490950
OpenAlexW2942732466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.