Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039146›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2019

Expectation and attention increase the integration of top-down and bottom-up signals in perception through different pathways.

Noam Gordon, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Roger Koenig-Robert, Jakob Hohwy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cortical travelling waves relate to variation in personality traits.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Neurons learn by predicting future activity.Nature machine intelligence · 2022
    Article
  18. Modulation of the Primary Auditory Thalamus When Recognizing Speech with Background Noise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noam GordonCognition and Philosophy Lab, Philosophy Department, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4438-7449
Naotsugu TsuchiyaMonash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-8701
Roger Koenig-RobertSchool of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8767-3552
Jakob HohwyCognition and Philosophy Lab, Philosophy Department, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-3060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception likely results from the interplay between sensory information and top-down signals. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, we utilised the hierarchical frequency tagging (HFT) method to examine how such integration is modulated by expectation and attention. Using intermodulation (IM) components as a measure of nonlinear signal integration, we show in three different experiments that both expectation and attention enhance integration between top-down and bottom-up signals. Based on a multispectral phase coherence (MSPC) measure, we present two direct physiological measures to demonstrate the distinct yet related mechanisms of expectation and attention, which would not have been possible using other amplitude-based measures. Our results link expectation to the modulation of descending signals and to the integration of top-down and bottom-up information at lower levels of the visual hierarchy. Meanwhile, the results link attention to the modulation of ascending signals and to the integration of information at higher levels of the visual hierarchy. These results are consistent with the predictive coding account of perception.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionAuditory PerceptionBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPerceptionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID31039146
PMCPMC6490885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.