Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039118›Full record

ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2019

Small interface changes have dramatic impacts: how mandatory fields in electronic medical records increased pertussis vaccination rates in Australian obstetric patients.

Roberto Orefice, Julie A Quinlivan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto OreficeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia Roberto.Orefice@act.gov.au.
Julie A QuinlivanSchool of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Australian National University · AUCentenary Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic health records have been widely introduced into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether a small interface change could improve compliance with a key quality indicator, namely antenatal pertussis vaccination.

methodsAudits were performed between 1-31 July 2015 and 1-31 July 2017 of all deliveries at the Centenary Hospital for Women and Children to determine compliance with antenatal pertussis vaccination. The single difference between time points was changing the interface so the antenatal pertussis vaccination field became compulsory.

results275 and 299 women delivered in the audit periods. Vaccination rates almost doubled (52.7% vs 91.4%, p<0.0001).

conclusionSmall interface changes increase compliance. Interface change could be considered for key quality outcomes in patient care.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient CompliancePrenatal CareVaccinationAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPertussis VaccinePregnancyRetrospective StudiesWhooping CoughPertussis Vaccinemandatory data pertussis vaccination obstetrics

Identifiers

PMID31039118
PMCPMC7062313
OpenAlexW2938721532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.