Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31039042›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2019

Regulator of G-protein signaling 5 regulates the shift from perivascular to parenchymal pericytes in the chronic phase after stroke.

Michaela Roth, Abderahim Gaceb, Andreas Enström, Thomas Padel, Guillem Genové, Ilknur Özen, Gesine Paul

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Eppur si muove: the dynamic brain pericyte.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Regulation of the Response of Brain Pericytes to Hypoxia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michaela RothTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abderahim GacebTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Andreas EnströmTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas PadelTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Guillem GenovéDepartment of Medicine, Integrated Cardio Metabolic Centre, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ilknur ÖzenTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gesine PaulTranslational Neurology Group, Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEIntegrated Cardio Metabolic Centre · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poststroke recovery requires multiple repair mechanisms, including vascular remodeling and blood-brain barrier (BBB) restoration. Brain pericytes are essential for BBB repair and angiogenesis after stroke, but they also give rise to scar-forming platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFR-β)-expressing cells. However, many of the molecular mechanisms underlying this pericyte response after stroke still remain unknown. Regulator of G-protein signaling 5 (RGS5) has been associated with pericyte detachment from the vascular wall, but whether it regulates pericyte function and vascular stabilization in the chronic phase of stroke is not known. Using RGS5-knockout (KO) mice, we study how loss of RGS5 affects the pericyte response and vascular remodeling in a stroke model at 7 d after ischemia. Loss of RGS5 leads to a shift toward an increase in the number of perivascular pericytes and reduction in the density of parenchymal PDGFR-β-expressing cells associated with normalized PDGFR-β activation after stroke. The redistribution of pericytes resulted in higher pericyte coverage, increased vascular density, preservation of vessel lengths, and a significant reduction in vascular leakage in RGS5-KO mice compared with controls. Our study demonstrates RGS5 in pericytes as an important target to enhance vascular remodeling.-Roth, M., Gaceb, A., Enström, A., Padel, T., Genové, G., Özen, I., Paul, G. Regulator of G-protein signaling 5 regulates the shift from perivascular to parenchymal pericytes in the chronic phase after stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCapillariesDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutNeovascularization, PhysiologicPericytesReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaRGS ProteinsSignal TransductionStrokeTime FactorsReceptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor betaRgs5 protein, mouseRGS ProteinsischemiaPDGFR-βvascular remodeling

Identifiers

PMID31039042
PMCPMC6662981
OpenAlexW2943521585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.