Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31038863›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Prognostic significance of inflammation-based prognostic scoring in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Taisuke Suyama, Shigeki Kanbe, Masanobu Maegawa, Hirofumi Shimizu, Koichi Nakajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taisuke SuyamaDepartment of Genitourinary, Sanaikai General Hospital (IMS), Japan.
Shigeki KanbeDepartment of Genitourinary, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan.
Masanobu MaegawaDepartment of Genitourinary, Sanaikai General Hospital (IMS), Japan.
Hirofumi ShimizuDepartment of Genitourinary, Sanaikai General Hospital (IMS), Japan.
Koichi NakajimaDepartment of Genitourinary, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate whether Glasgow Prognostic Score has prognostic significance in patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients with upper urinary urothelial carcinoma. We set the cut-off value for C-reactive protein as 1.0mg/dL, and 3.5mg/dL for albumin as Glasgow Prognostic Score. Their blood data including albumin and C-reactive protein for Glasgow Prognostic Score and cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 as a tumor marker were measured before starting treatment. The patients were stratified into three groups with Glasgow Prognostic Score: The Group-1, albumin ≥3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein < 1.0mg/dL; Group-2, albumin < 3.5g/dL or C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL; Group-3, albumin < 3.5g/dL and C-reactive protein ≥1.0mg/dL.

resultsThe median follow-up for all patients was 26.9 months (range: 10.9-91.1 months), during which 37 (50%) patients died. There was a signifi cant difference in the estimated survival rate among the 3 groups stratified by Glasgow Prognostic Score. The estimated survival rate in the Group-1 was significantly higher than those in Groups 2 and 3. In the univariate analysis C-reactive protein, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were significant predictors of overall survival. On the multivariate analysis, serum cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 and Glasgow Prognostic Score were independently associated with shorter overall survival.

conclusionOur review suggests Glasgow Prognostic Score may play as a prognostic predictor for upper urinary urothelial carcinoma.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKeratin-19MaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReference ValuesReproducibility of Resultsantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorC-Reactive ProteinKeratin-19Serum AlbuminC-Reactive ProteinKeratin-19Urinary Tract

Identifiers

PMID31038863
PMCPMC6786111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.