Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31038861›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Second brazilian consensus on the treatment of advanced prostate cancer - a SBOC-SBU-SBRT panel review.

André Deeke Sasse, Rodolfo Borges Dos Reis, Lucas Mendes Nogueira, Fernando Cotait Maluf, Daniel Herchenhorn, Oren Smaletz, Volney Soares Lima, Fábio Schutz, Diogo Bastos, Evanius Garcia Wiermann and 12 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of complex urethral stenosis in public centers from developing countries in 21st century.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

André Deeke SasseGrupo SONHE, Oncologia, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Rodolfo Borges Dos ReisDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade de São Paulo- USP, Campus de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Lucas Mendes NogueiraDivisão de Urologia e Departamento de Cirurgia Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de MG - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Fernando Cotait MalufHospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Daniel HerchenhornRede D'Or São Luiz, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Oren SmaletzDepartamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brasil.
Volney Soares LimaOncocentro, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Fábio SchutzHospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Diogo BastosDepartamento de Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - ICESP, SP, Brasil.
Evanius Garcia WiermannSociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clinica - SBOC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Igor Alexandre Protzner MorbeckClinica AMO, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil.
Leonardo Fontes JardimDepartamento de Oncologia, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo - ICESP, SP, Brasil.
Vinicius Carrera SouzaSociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clinica - SBOC, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Icaro Thiago CarvalhoDepartamento de Oncologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brasil.
Elton Trigo Teixeira LeiteHospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Archimedes NardozzaDepartamento de Urologia e Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Antonio Carlos Lima PompeoFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Urologia, Santo André, Brasil.
Francisco BretasHospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Marcos Lima de Oliveira LealDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brasil.
Marcus Vinicius SadiDepartamento de Urologia e Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
José Ricardo Tuma da PonteDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade do Estado do Pará - UEPA, Belém, PA, Brasil.
Gustavo F CarvalhalDivisão de Urologia e Departamento de Cirurgia, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUC RS, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer and the fi fth leading cause of cancer deaths. In Brazil, it is likewise the second most common cancer among men, second only to non-melanoma skin cancers. The aim of this consensus is to align different opinions and interpretations of the medical literature in a practical and patient-oriented approach. The fi rst Brazilian Consensus on the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer was published in 2017, with the goal of reducing the heterogeneity of therapeutic conduct in Brazilian patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We acknowledge that in Brazil the incorporation of different technologies is a big challenge, especially in the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), which allows for the disparity in the options available to patients treated in different institutions. In order to update the recommendations and to make them objective and easily accessible, once more a panel of specialists was formed in order to discuss and elaborate a new Brazilian Consensus on Advanced Prostate Cancer. This Consensus was written through a joint initiative of the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology (SBOC) and the Brazilian Society of Urology (SBU) to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of patients with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBrazilClinical Decision-MakingHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic NeoplasmsSocieties, MedicalAntineoplastic AgentsConsensusProstatic NeoplasmsTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID31038861
PMCPMC6786127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.