ArticleJMIR medical informatics2019
Clinical Requirements of Future Patient Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03514173 (Analysis of Sociotechnical Acceptance and Workflow Integration of a Remote Patient Monitoring Device on an Intensive Care Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Analysis of Sociotechnical Acceptance and Workflow Integration of a Remote Patient Monitoring Device on an Intensive Care Unit
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Participant Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Comparative Analysis of Innovative Digital Platforms.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Impact of Alarm Fatigue on the Work of Nurses in an Intensive Care Environment-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs in the General Ward Using Wearable Devices: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Trial
- Parents and Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Vital Signs Monitoring Technologies in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An International Survey.American journal of perinatology · 2026Article
- Digital Transformation in Critical Care: Implications for Quality of Care, Infection Control, and Clinical Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Critical Care Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Avatar-based versus conventional patient monitoring with distant vision: a computer-based simulation study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
- The Correlation Between Attitudes Towards Health Technologies and Professional Self-Efficacy in Intensive Care Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.International nursing review · 2025Article
- Barriers and Facilitators of the Use of Computerized Critical Care Information Systems in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A retrospective cross-sectional study showing wearable smartwatches enhance patient safety and efficiency in the intensive care unit.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Factors Associated With Portal and Telehealth Uptake and Use in a Minoritized, Low-Income Community: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Technology Integration to Support Nurses in an "Inpatient Room of the Future": Qualitative Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Enhancing the Usability of Patient Monitoring Devices in Intensive Care Units: Usability Engineering Processes for Early Warning System (EWS) Evaluation and Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Developing a Scalable Annotation Method for Large Datasets That Enhances Alarms With Actionability Data to Increase Informativeness: Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Exploring ICU nurses' response to alarm management and strategies for alleviating alarm fatigue: a meta-synthesis and systematic review.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding intravenous medication errors prevention among ICU nurses and influencing factors: a multicenter, cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Wireless Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Fiction or Closer Reality?Neonatology · 2025Article
- Designing and psychometric evaluation of safe nursing care instrument in intensive care units.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Alarm Management in Provisional COVID-19 Intensive Care Units: Retrospective Analysis and Recommendations for Future Pandemics.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Alarm Management in Intensive Care: Qualitative Triangulation Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the intensive care unit (ICU), continuous patient monitoring is essential to detect critical changes in patients' health statuses and to guide therapy. The implementation of digital health technologies for patient monitoring may further improve patient safety. However, most monitoring devices today are still based on technologies from the 1970s.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate statements by ICU staff on the current patient monitoring systems and their expectations for future technological developments in order to investigate clinical requirements and barriers to the implementation of future patient monitoring.
methodsThis prospective study was conducted at three intensive care units of a German university hospital. Guideline-based interviews with ICU staff-5 physicians, 6 nurses, and 4 respiratory therapists-were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the grounded theory approach.
resultsEvaluating the current monitoring system, ICU staff put high emphasis on usability factors such as intuitiveness and visualization. Trend analysis was rarely used; inadequate alarm management as well as the entanglement of monitoring cables were rated as potential patient safety issues. For a future system, the importance of high usability was again emphasized; wireless, noninvasive, and interoperable monitoring sensors were desired; mobile phones for remote patient monitoring and alarm management optimization were needed; and clinical decision support systems based on artificial intelligence were considered useful. Among perceived barriers to implementation of novel technology were lack of trust, fear of losing clinical skills, fear of increasing workload, and lack of awareness of available digital technologies.
conclusionsThis qualitative study on patient monitoring involves core statements from ICU staff. To promote a rapid and sustainable implementation of digital health solutions in the ICU, all health care stakeholders must focus more on user-derived findings. Results on alarm management or mobile devices may be used to prepare ICU staff to use novel technology, to reduce alarm fatigue, to improve medical device usability, and to advance interoperability standards in intensive care medicine. For digital transformation in health care, increasing the trust and awareness of ICU staff in digital health technology may be an essential prerequisite.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03514173; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03514173 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/77T1HwOzk).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.