Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037739›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of small animal practice2019

Spaying and urinary incontinence in bitches under UK primary veterinary care: a case-control study.

C Pegram, D G O'Neill, D B Church, J Hall, L Owen, D C Brodbelt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of small animal practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Owner-Reported Health Events in Australian Farm Working Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C PegramPathobiology and Population Science, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8367-5294
D G O'NeillPathobiology and Population Science, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, AL9 7TA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-2723
D B ChurchClinical Sciences and Services, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, AL9 7TA, UK.
J HallRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9801-4264
L OwenDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0ES, UK.
D C BrodbeltPathobiology and Population Science, The Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Herts, AL9 7TA, UK.
Royal Veterinary College · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

BSAVA Petsavers
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate associations between spaying and urinary incontinence in bitches under primary veterinary care in the UK. MATERIALS AND

methodsA case-control study was nested within the study population of 333,910 bitches, which included all bitches within the VetCompass database with an electronic patient record in 2016 or in both 2015 and 2017. The electronic records were searched automatically for urinary incontinence cases, which were manually reviewed for inclusion. All non-cases were included as controls. Additional demographic and clinical information was extracted on cases and controls.

resultsThe study included 427 incident cases and 1708 controls that were presented between November 1, 2014 and October 31, 2017. Prior spaying was associated with increased odds of urinary incontinence (odds ratio: 3.01; 95% CIs: 2.23 to 4.05). Increased odds of urinary incontinence were additionally associated with increasing age and increasing bodyweight. Age at spay was not associated with urinary incontinence. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The findings support spaying as a major risk factor associated with urinary incontinence, but age at spay appears to be of less clinical importance. These results will help assist clinicians in making evidence-based recommendations on spaying while taking other considerations for urinary incontinence into account.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesAnimalsCase-Control StudiesDogsFemaleHumansOvariectomyUnited KingdomUrinary Incontinence

Identifiers

PMID31037739
PMCPMC6850460
OpenAlexW2943823079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.