Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037612›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2019

Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Human Appetite (Satiety/Satiation) and Its Contribution to Obesity.

Catherine Gibbons, Mark Hopkins, Kristine Beaulieu, Pauline Oustric, John E Blundell

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 155 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine GibbonsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, 4 Lifton Place, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. c.gibbons@leeds.ac.uk.
Mark HopkinsSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Kristine BeaulieuSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, 4 Lifton Place, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Pauline OustricSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, 4 Lifton Place, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
John E BlundellSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, 4 Lifton Place, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe goals of this paper are to report current research practices in investigations of human appetite control and to assess their relationships with emerging theoretical principles. Appetite is often distinguished by the separation of homeostatic and hedonic processes. RECENT

findingsThis report assesses the validity of a homeostatic toolkit to measure subjectively perceived hunger and its relationship to the developing processes of satiation (control of meal size) and satiety (control of the post-eating period). The capacity of a procedure to measure the influence of hedonic processes on food intake is also evaluated. A major issue is the relationship between the pattern of eating behaviour (influenced by the underlying drive to eat and the inhibition induced by the act of eating itself) and the parallel underlying profile of hormonal and other metabolic biomarkers. Increasing recognition is being given to individual variability in the expression of appetite, and the fact that the use of the average (mean) response conceals important information about the nature of appetite control. There is a growing interest in the identification of satiety phenotypes that operate in parallel to metabolic phenotypes. Interestingly, energy expenditure (metabolic and behavioural) contributes to an energy balance framework for understanding energy intake (appetite).

Indexed as

AppetiteSatiationAppetite RegulationBiomarkersBody CompositionEatingEnergy MetabolismGastrointestinal HormonesHealth BehaviorHumansHungerMealsObesityPeptide HormonesPortion SizeBiomarkersGastrointestinal HormonesPeptide HormonesAppetite controlEnergy balanceObesitySatiationSatiety

Identifiers

PMID31037612
PMCPMC6517339
OpenAlexW2942856318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.