Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31037474›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019

The effect of contrast agents on left ventricular parameters calculated by a threshold-based software module: does it truly matter?

Andrea Szűcs, Anna Réka Kiss, Ferenc Imre Suhai, Attila Tóth, Zsófia Gregor, Márton Horváth, Csilla Czimbalmos, Ibolya Csécs, Zsófia Dohy, Liliána Erzsébet Szabó and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea SzűcsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary. szucsand@gmail.com.
Anna Réka KissHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary. annarekak@gmail.com.
Ferenc Imre SuhaiHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Attila TóthHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia GregorHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Márton HorváthHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Csilla CzimbalmosHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Ibolya CsécsHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia DohyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Liliána Erzsébet SzabóHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Hajnalka VágóHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUEötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

National Research, Development and Innovation Office (NKFIH) of Hungary NVKP_16-1-2016-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The acquisition of short-axis (SA) cine magnetic resonance (MR) images after the administration of contrast agent (CA) is a common, time-saving technique, but a decreased difference in the blood-myocardium contrast on these steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine scans could change the calculated parameters when using threshold-based papillary and trabecular muscle (PTM) quantification. We studied the effect of CA on the parameters calculated from pre- and post-CA SA cine images in noncompaction cardiomyopathy (NC-CMP) and healthy (H) participants using a threshold-based module. A total of 39 individuals (20 patients and 19 healthy) were included prospectively in this study. After the pre-CA SA images were acquired, i.v. gadobutrol (GA) or gadobenate dimeglumine (GD) (GA vs. GD: NC-CMP = 12 vs. 8; C = 12 vs. 7) was administered, and SA scans were repeated after two minutes. A threshold-based PTM software was used for postprocessing. Pre-CA and post-CA SA images were analyzed, and the parameters were compared in both the NC-CMP and H groups. The left ventricular volumes were significantly larger, while the left ventricular myocardial (LVmass) and trabecular mass (LVtrab) values were significantly smaller on the post-CA scans (NC-CMP: pre-CA vs. post-CA, EDV: 74.0 ± 13.6 vs. 81.1 ± 16.3 ml/m

Indexed as

SoftwareStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCase-Control StudiesContrast MediaFemaleHeart VentriclesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIsolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular MyocardiumMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMeglumineMiddle AgedContrast Mediagadobenic acidgadobutrolMeglumineOrganometallic CompoundsCardiac magnetic resonanceContrast agentLeft ventricular noncompactionThreshold-based trabecular quantification

Identifiers

PMID31037474
PMCPMC6700040
OpenAlexW2943162868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.